Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
the Army Air Forces during December 1941and the early months of
1942. Although neither trained nor equipped specifically for the
purpose, Army units possessed aircraft whose range generally ex-
ceeded that of available Navy planes. As soon as the news of the
Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor arrived, the NANCF commander
requested the commanding general of the Eastern Defense Command
to undertake off shore patrols with all available aircraft. Accordingly,
on the afternoon of 8 December 1941,units of the I Bomber Com-
mand began flights over the ocean to the limit of their range.ls
But it was a motley array of planes that I Bomber Command assem-
bled in December to meet the submarine threat. At virtually the same
time that it was called upon to undertake overwater patrol duties, it
was stripped of the best-trained of its tactical units for missions on the
West Coast” and for overseas assignment. Every available Army
plane in the First Air Force capable of carrying a bomb load was
drafted to augment what was left of I Bomber Command. As a result
of these frantic efforts, approximately I O O aircraft of various two-
engine types were assembled and placed a t the disposal of the naval
commander. To this force, likened by one observer to Joffre’s taxi-
cab army of 1914, the I Air Support Command added substantial aid
in the way of reconnaissan~e.~~
By the middle of January ‘942, this Army patrol had gained a little
in strength and regularity of operation. T h e I Bomber Command was
by that time maintaining patrols a t the rate of two flights each day
from Westover Field, Massachusetts, Mitchel Field, New York, and
Langley Field, Virginia, and was in the process of inaugurating
similar missions from Bangor, Maine. These flights, averaging three
planes each, extended, weather permitting and according to the type
of plane, to a maximum distance of 600 miles to sea. The longer dis-
tances were covered only by the few B-17’s operating from Langley
Field, seldom more than nine of which were in commission. In addi-
tion to the aircraft of I Bomber Command, I Air Support Command
operated patrols during daylight hours in single-engine observation
planes extending about forty miles offshore from Portland, Maine, to
Wilmington, North Carolina. These planes were not armed, nor did
they carry sufficient fuel for more than two or three hours’ flying,
and not more than ten of them were maintained in the air along the
See above, Chap. 8.
5 2 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.