Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R 11
units best equipped for antisubmarine operations trained almost ex-
clusively in the performance of their primary function of bombard-
ment rather than in a secondary, emergency duty of antisubmarine
p a t r ~ l . ~
More serious was the inability of the Navy to meet a crisis falling
in an area of primary responsibility. Whether because of its tradi-
tional concern for the problems of the Pacific or for other reasons,
the crisis of December 1941 found the Navy unable to perform the
offshore patrol necessary in order to cope effectively with the subma-
rines. T h e commander of the North Atlantic Naval Coastal Frontier
(in February 1942 replaced by Eastern Sea Frontier), on whom fell
the immediate responsibility for countering the submarine menace,
reported that he had at his disposal on 2 2 December 1941,after other
demands on his resources had been met, a force of some twenty sur-
face vessels capable of taking limited action against submarines. This
force he regarded as woefully inadequate for its task, since there was
“not a vessel available that an enemy submarine could not outdistance
when operating on the surface.” “In most cases,” he added, “the guns
of these vessels would be outranged by those of the submarine.””
Nor was it possible to augment these forces to any appreciable extent
before May 1942. Repeated and urgent requests for destroyers and
escort vessels were denied by COMINCH on the ground that equally
imperative needs existed elsewhere.” This inadequacy of surface
forces naturally threw a heavier immediate burden upon available air
resources, but strength in naval aircraft at hand for antisubniarine
patrol proved equally insufficient. Of approximately IOO planes at the
disposal of the N A N C F commander on the outbreak of war, the
great majority were trainers, scouts, or transport types, unsuited for
the task at hand. By the end of January the situation had improved
slightly, though not in the category of long-range patrol. “There
are,” the N A N C F commander reported to COMINCH on 14 Jan-
uary 1942, “no effective planes attached to the Frontier. . .capable of
maintaining long-range seaward patrols.” In reply to his urgent re-
quest for at least one squadron of patrol planes, he was told that
additional allocations depended on future production.12 Here, as else-
where in these early days of 1942, the demands made upon all services
for men and equipment were great but the supply small.
So it was that the burden of antisubmarine patrol fell heavily on
522

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.