“Nevers”44 pages
- p. 43 …cavalry mounted on gas driven flying horses” never arrived to
“sweep the Germans from the sky…
- p. 46 …Mitchell never received an American air force commensurate with
the ambitious idens of air power which…
- p. 49 …This project, like so many others, had lagged, and the Air Service was
never equipped during…
- p. 50 …the Army or the Air Corps?” but never, “Are
you in the Army or the Corps…
- p. 55 …any Air Service officers, and I have never heard
anybody yet-any Air Service officer-against…
- p. 69 …But one axiom,
with its corollaries, never varied. T o him the airplane was first and…
- p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be
completely stopped, but their effects could best…
- p. 94 …rate for the time being, the decision never-
theless left an open question as to how…
- p. 121 …large-scale warfare; production of combat types never exceeded 300
aircraft a month. The pattern of…
- p. 122 …the German Air Force, the
Regia Aeronautica never exhibited sufficient power to be decisive in
the…
- p. 133 …Except for a few raids against French
factories, the force had never been employed in a…
- p. 140 …into
a complete war economy production was never equal to the demands
of our own forces…
- p. 150 …Long-term needs
of the Air Corps and the sudden availability of funds in quantities
never…
- p. 181 …Actually, the Air Staff had
never approved of the method followed in RAINBOW No. 5 . l…
- p. 217 …Members of the Hawaiian Air Force, who had never flown
heavy bombers, began to receive intensive…
- p. 219 …were not then satisfactory for permanent garrisons. Never-
theless, the commander of the Hawaiian Department, Lt…
- p. 227 …T h e planes never reached their destination. Other
bombardment units were being prepared for transfer…
- p. 241 …responsible officers, a few crucial points
have never been satisfactorily explained.
T h e general pattern…
- p. 277 …motors, sole-
noids, and gun mounts-were never found. After many hours of fruit-
less search…
- p. 288 …planners and
from which AAF Headquarters was never to deviate.
The translation of the accepted grand…
- p. 303 …the principal features of the plan
were never challenged, it was subsequently revised in a draft…
- p. 309 …W a r Plans Division was
never incorporated into GHQ and remained a potential rival to…
- p. 336 …the shooting and wrote that they were never
able to make out an airplane.g6It is…
- p. 412 …As it happened, the B-24's never
returned to India, but, instead, remained in the…
- p. 457 …Meanwhile the Edsall with the remaining
pilots had headed for Java, never to be heard from…
- p. 492 …Squadron was assigned, but which it would never reach, going from
Australia to Tongatabu; ( 3 ) Christmas…
- p. 500 …deck of a carrier presented a problem never
before challenged by Army planes. Hence an accelerated…
- p. 502 …the bows and wetting the flight deck. Never before had this been
accomplished, yet now it…
- p. 509 …Island, in the
Louisiade Archipelago.” They were never needed, for on 7-8 May
the two…
- p. 513 …exist, it was at a point which never reached the
aircrews, for on the operational level…
- p. 524 …handicaps under which
AAF planes had operated. Never were more than fourteen B- I 7’s…
- p. 527 …AAF planners clung firmly to their belief that
proper observance of economy of force would never…
- p. 531 …Crews which had
previously never loaded torpedoes now for the first time fitted these
weapons into…
- p. 544 …But the Japanese never at
any time based their bombers in appreciable numbers a t either…
- p. 548 …26's in torpedo-dropping, but they never would be put into
All told, the record…
- p. 556 …until it had been thoroughly trained and never to com-
mit it piecemeal. General Magruder had…
- p. 560 …pressed into service against the Germans," and never reached the
CBI." Colonel Haynes had reached India…
- p. 606 …reason that the Antilles Air Task Force
never evolved, as did I Bomber Command, into an…
- p. 614 …that reason deserving a high
priority, could never dispose of the U-boat menace but must…
- p. 635 …In Washington the Munitions Assign-
ments Board t had never considered this schedule as more than…
- p. 670 …they bombed from 39,200 feet, and never
below 30,000. By AAF standards they had…
- p. 672 …Goering had never put enough bombers over England,
nor had he concentrated his forces on the…
- p. 690 …of co-operation and combined action probably never
before equaled by the military forces of two…
- p. 729 …shoot at aerial targets, and several
had never operated a turret in the air. This deficiency…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
installations as were necessary for operation, experimentation, and
training connected with the fleet. This legislation provided the basis
for the two air arms, but left undefined the responsibility in cases
where joint action might become necessary.'
After 1935 the controlling statement of policy on such points was
provided by Joint Action of the Army and Navy, an agreement
which sought to clarify the relationship between the two services but
which was marked at the same time, as previously noted, by ambi-
guity on certain crucial questions." By its provisions, the Navy held
responsibility for all inshore and offshore patrol for the purpose of
protecting shipping and defending the coastal frontiers, whereas the
Army held primary responsibility for defense of the coast itself.
Army aircraft might, however, temporarily execute Navy functions
in support of or in lieu of Navy forces; and, conversely, Navy air-
craft might be called upon to support Army operations. In neither
case should any restriction be placed by one service on the freedom
of the other to use its power against the enemy should the need arise.
Each service was declared responsible for providing the aircraft re-
quired for the proper performance of its primary function-in the
Army's case, the conduct of air operations over land and such air
operations over the sea as were incident to the accomplishment of
Army functions; in the case of the Navy, conduct of operations over
the sea and such air operations over the land as were incident to the
accomplishment of Navy functions.' All of which left the respon-
sibility for the conduct of seaward patrols and the protection of ship-
ping definitely up to the Navy.
But this formal agreement did not preclude further discussion.
There remained, in particular, a question of command. It was still an
open question whether the Navy should control all air operations in
coastal defense or whether it should control only those operations
specifically in support of the fleet. Naval spokesmen claimed that
unity of command should be vested in whichever service held para-
mount importance in any given situation. Then, assuming that naval
pre-eminence existed in coastal defense, they claimed that unity of
command in such operations should rest with the Navy. The Army,
sensing a train of thought which might prove ruinous to its control of
air forces, raised its voice in protest. The assumption of naval pre-
eminence in coastal defense, it declared unsound. In some situations
* See above, p. 68.
520