Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
back, two were damaged.83 Attacks on Myitkyina were resumed on
the 29th, when four planes bombed from 2 3 , 0 0 0 feet. The following
day a similar attack was made, but as no enemy activity was in evi-
dence on either occasion the attacks were di~continued.~~During the
first week of June, the small force undertook its final flights over
Burma before the weather and a shortage of spare parts combined to
ground the last of them.85 Five planes attacked the Rangoon docks
and harbor area on I June, reporting that one tanker had been sunk
and that another had been left listing.86Three days later, two bombers
struck a t the same target area without observing the results; attacked
by ten fighters, one plane was destroyed, another seriously damaged.87
And this was the last until the monsoon Iifted.
Brereton’s Departure for the Middle East
By mid-June, when the monsoon had come, the Americans were
beginning to appreciate the magnitude of the task involved in estab-
lishing and operating an air force in Asia. The report of the Grady
mission, plus three months of experience gained by the Tenth, had
revealed that even for a small force the 1ogisticaI probIem was stagger-
ing. Unable to use the more direct routes through the Mediterranean
and across the Pacific, and forced to sail in convoys for protection
against enemy submarines, ships from the United States required two
months to make the I 3,000-statute-mile voyage. Furthermore, the
demands of more active theaters for cargo ships, transports, and escort
vessels were so heavy that bottoms allotted to Asia were kept to the
barest minimum.88 And after the ships reached India the logistical
problems were by no means at an end. Japanese naval and air action
in the Bay of Bengal restricted the use of Calcutta and forced incom-
ing ships to dock along the west coast, where only three ports of any
importance were available-Cochin, Bombay, and Karachi. Cochin
was entirely too far south to serve as an American port of entry;
Bombay was overtaxed with British shipping. Hence, although heavy
port equipment had to be imported and existing storage space greatly
enlarged, the original choice of Karachi had been confirmed by sub-
sequent study.”
Had it been possible to use ports on the eastern shore, a third im-
portant problem might have been less troublesome; but dependence
on Karachi forced a maximum dependence on the Indian railroads.
Outside northwestern India, the railway system was not highly de-
5 10

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.