Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
C O M M I T M E N T S TO C H I N A
supply line upon which operations in China depended. Upon being
informed early in March that development of the air ferry ’ to China
would be a responsibility of the Tenth, General Brereton had re-
quested that ferrying personnel and equipment sent to the theater be
assigned to the air force. Brig. Gen. Robert Olds of the Air Corps
Ferrying Command objected on the ground that such an arrangement
would result in diversions from the transport service to combat
organization~.’~Brereton having renewed his request on 9 April, the
W a r Department replied that policies relating to the movement and
supply of planes would be administered throughout by a central office
in Washington, but that insofar as ferry operations were affected by
military developments in India the control would be exercised by
Brereton. T o this rather ambiguous explanation there was added the
information that the air freight service from Assam to China would
be operated by the 1st Ferrying Group under the control of Stil-
well.‘” General Arnold, after Brereton had indicated a continuing
concern over the uncertainties and confusion of command respon-
~ibilities,’~attempted to clarify the problem in a message to Stilwell
which declared that Brereton held responsibility and authority over
aircraft between Karachi and Calcutta, while General Stilwell would
control aircraft designated for service to China. T h e latter was also
vested with authority to change the location of operating stations and
ferry control detachments in both India and China. It further was
promised that an officer who fully understood ferrying operations
would be provided for Brereton’s staff.” T h e general statement of
policy, however ambiguous it seemed a t the time, at least provided
a principle of action which, with the passage of time and a better
understanding by all parties concerned, permitted the development
of a centralized control of strategic air services while not entirely
ignoring the normal prerogatives of a theater command in the event
of an extreme emergency. But the administrative division between
trans-India and India-China operations ran counter to the arguments
of experience soon gained in operating the service.
During his incumbency at Dinjan, Colonel Haynes had discarded
* Originally the term “ferry” was used in the CBI to describe organizations more
largely concerned with air transport operations than with the ferrying of aircraft.
It is possible that some of the misunderstandings which developed stemmed from
this loose usage, which in turn reflects the general difficulty experienced in clarify-
ing the many problems arising from this new type of air operation. (See above,
Chap. 9.)
507

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.