Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R 1 1
Secretary of War Newton D. Baker and consisting of men with wide
executive experience in aviation, returned from a tour of Europe with
an unequivocal indorsement of the separate department of air.l’
Baker gave wider circulation to the Dickman and Menoher reports
than to the Crowell-indeed, the latter seems to have been deliberately
suppressed-and he supported the proposals of the General Staff,
which in modified form took effect in the Army Reorganization Act
of 4 June 1920.’’ This law gave formal recognition to the Air Service
as a combatant arm of the Army. The office of Second Assistant Sec-
retary of War (then vacant) was abolished. Authorized strength of
the Air Service was set at 1,5 1 6 officers, 2,500 flying cadets, and 16,000
enlisted men, out of a total of 280,000 for the Army. Specific com-
plaints were answered by regulations requiring that tactical units be
commanded by flyers, authorizing flight pay of 50 per cent base pay,
and ambiguously stipulating a limit on the number of nonflying of-
ficers. In spite of these minor concessions, the new law was regarded
by many aviators as a crushing defeat for Air Service aspirations.
In his annual report for 1919,the Secretary of War concluded a
lengthy analysis of the case for air power with the judgment that “on
the whole case, it seems quite clear that the time has not come to set
up an independent department of the air.” H e was willing to soften
that statement with the caveat that “the art [aviation] itself is so new
and so fascinating, and the men in it have so taken on the character of
supermen, that it is difficult to reason coldly, and perhaps dangerous
to attempt any limitation upon the future based even upon the most
favorable view of present attainment.” l9 The aviators, who rarely
reasoned coldly, were confident of what the future would hold, but
they thought that its arrival could be hastened by direct action in the
present, Balked within the War Department, they carried their fight
into a broader arena, seeking by spectacular stunts and by equally
spectacular statements to win public support to their cause.
For six tumultuous years Billy Mitchell was a national figure, seldom
absent from the headlines for long. H e had returned from France as
the best known of Baker’s “supermen.” With his war record he might
have expected to head the peacetime Air Service, but instead he served
as assistant chief successively to Menoher and Patrick-and to their
frequent discomfiture. Later, Mitchell expressed the opinion that
“changes in military systems come about only through the pressure
of public opinion or disaster in war.” ’O Public opinion had been re-
24

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.