Documents / Document
This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.
“Cairo”26 pages
T H E A R M Y A I R A R M B E T W E E N T W O W A R S each side that ;he other side had been unreasonable.” T h e contro- versy was characterized by much poor rhetoric, by extraneous political issues, by Fabian tactics on the part of those in power, and at times by a disconcerting lack of decorum and of candor. T o the public it be- came a battle royal of “Billy Mitchell versus the Brass Hats,” with the climax in his court-martial, a cause ce‘libre unique in American military history. But, from a purely administrative viewpoint, the struggle may be conceived as running through four phases, punctu- ated by the Army Reorganization Act of 1920, the Air Corps Act of 1926, and the formation of the GHQ Air Force in 1935. Legislative efforts to establish aviation as a combatant branch of the Army and as a separate service had begun, respectively, in 1913 and 1916.Attracting little support, those efforts had failed, and, when the United States entered World War I, its Army air arm consisted of the Aviation Section, Signal Corps, as provided in an act of 1 8 July 1 9 1 4 . ’ ~It was the failure of that organization and its allied offices to adjust to the demands of large-scale war which led to the establishment in 19 I 8 of the Air Service as a quasi-autonomous body within the W a r Department. More successful than its predecessor, the Air Service was far from perfect as an administrative agency, and it existed only as an emergency measure set up by executive order. After the Armistice, in spite of further temporary expedients adopted by President Wilson, the loss of key personnel through resignations threatened to leave military aviation without leadership in the crucial period of demobili- zation of the air force and collapse of the war-born aircraft industry.“ T h e demand for new policies to guide a peacetime program was not peculiar to the Air Service. In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment as prescribed in the National Defense Act of 3 June 1916.Returning Air Service officers were eager that any reorganization should provide for a separate air force. Congressional support was stronger than in the prewar period, but, of the eight bills introduced in 1919-20to provide for a Depart- ment of Aeronautics, only one was favorably reported.” Expert studies of the problems involved served merely to confirm opinions previously held. Pershing’s Dickman Board at Chaumont and the W a r Department’s Menoher Board at Washington opposed any change in the control of aviation, the latter concluding that “the military air force must remain under the complete control of the Army and form an integral part thereof.” Yet the Crowell mission, appointed by 2 3
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.