Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
during that movement, and to provide after the fall of Burma the
nucleus of an American air unit that would fight on in China.
The planes in their operations followed closely, however, precon-
ceived tactical patterns. Using a two-ship element in hit-and-run tac-
tics, the pilots extracted the fullest advantage from the superior diving
and level-flight speed of the P-~oB,while nullifying the enemy
fighter’s superiority in maneuverability and rate of climb by avoiding
dogfights. Against his bombers they also used a diving attack, fre-
quently coming out of the dive to strike the bomber from below. The
ruggedness of the P-40 and its superior firepower, together with an
emphasis on accurate gunnery, constant reliance on the two-plane
element, and the valiant work of ground crews enabled the “Flying
Tigers” to destroy an almost incredible number of the more fragile
Japanese planes while sustaining minimum losses. Even when the
enemy after his first experience sought to wipe out the RAF and
A V G contingents in Burma by sending an overwhelming fighter
escort with his bombers, the air discipline of the American pilots
held and kept down their losses. More serious losses were sustained
in strafing attacks on the airfields they used, but the Volunteers to the
last managed to keep a few planes in condition and offered at least
a token resistance to almost every enemy attack. By the end of Feb-
ruary, however, Rangoon had become a shambles, and during the
first week in March the A V G pilots withdrew to Magwe. Following
a heavy enemy attack on Magwe, they retreated over the China
border to a forward base at Loiwing, where the Central Aircraft
plant had been converted into an overhaul depot.17 By the close of
April the campaign for Burma was approaching its end, and the
squadron was forced back to Kunming, where it joined the remainder
of the group.
The Burma Road was now useless, and Chennault, who had been
recalled to active duty in April and promoted to brigadier general,
sent part of his force east to Kweilin and Hengyang. This deploy-
ment promised better protection for the exposed cities of unoccupied
China, and a fuller opportunity for activity against Japanese air
forces. The A V G for all practical purposes had long since become
a part of the armed forces of the United States, and plans had been
made for its incorporation into the AAF. But the A V G was a volun-
teer group in fact as well as name; many of its personnel had no
former identification with the AAF, and upon the dissolution of the
490

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.