Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Virtually all operations were flown from areas that were remote from
the more thickly settled sections of Australia; living conditions were
primitive, the food was chiefly an unfamiliar Australian ration, the
incidence of dengue fever and malaria was high, and facilities for
hospitalization and recreation were more than inadequate.2s In these
circumstances, the strain of unusually difficult operations took a higher
toll. Personnel who had fought through the Philippine and Java
campaigns suffered effects of fatigue that at times approached a
defeatist attitude; even those who had flown their first combat mission
in April had to fight a feeling of disillusionment. Long overwater
flights, the dropping of a few bombs with unobserved results, the
loss of friends to combat and accident, the lack of opportunity for
leave and rotation, the slowness of promotion, and a rather confusing
system of operational control, all added up to a trying experience
that seemed to have little if anything to do with the outcome of the
war. Personal relations with the Australians were generally excellent,
for the two peoples had much in common, but the American flyer
tended to resent the extent of RAAF control and to find in its
administrative forms, as with any unfamiliar government form, a
ready source of grievance.” With the inevitably limited perspective
which modern war imposes upon the individual participant, dependent
upon the leadership of officers who often were as yet young and
inexperienced, and lacking the assistance of effectively organized
informational services, he had trouble in assessing his own part with
reference to the whole or even in recognizing that he and his im-
mediate fellows were beginning to function like a team.
Responsible officers were alert to these and other needs, and some
of them had occasion for satisfaction with the progress made.30
Air Services still suffered because of an insufficient number of trained
personnel and the necessity of resorting to cannibalizing aircraft in
order to get spare parts, but through the agencies of the Australian
government an increasingly effective liaison had been established
between the Allied command and Australian industry. Some parts
and very helpful maintenance facilities were now available from
Australian sources. It was possible to provide a complete overhaul
for all types of American engines. With local assistance in the pro-
vision of materials and tools, the supply and maintenance section of
Air Services, under Col. Carl Connell, was pioneering in the design
and development of a fifty-gallon steel interchangeable belly tank for
482

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.