Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
flew two missions a day for this purpose over New Guinea and New
Britain and on occasion to the Solomons and the Netherlands East
Indies. Indeed, reconnaissance flights continued to levy heavily upon
the bombers of all classes available for offensive operations; even the
3d Group’s B-25’s flew better than 1 2 0 reconnaissance sorties in the
month of May, when the presence of the enemy’s fleet in the Coral
Sea created a special demand for this type of service.21 The B-26’s
were based in the Townsville area, and for the mission to Rabaul
each plane was fitted with a 25o-gallon bomb bay tank and took on
a bomb load usually of 4 x 500-lb. bombs or 2 0 x Ioo-lb. bombs
prior to the 6oo-mile flight to Port Moresby. Having arrived there,
preferably about dusk, an advance detachment of the group readied
the planes for the next day’s mission under cover of darkness. They
would take off in the early morning, unless the start was delayed for
the purpose of confusing the enemy’s defense, and normally would
follow a route that took them for forty or fifty miles along the New
Guinea coast, then across the Owen Stanley range at approximately
7,000 feet, and through equatorial weather which frequently proved
as dangerous as enemy fighters. Over Rabaul, the Marauders made
their runs at something under 10,000 feet, after which they turned
for the 1,300-mile flight, broken again at Moresby, to their bases.”
Between 6 April and 24 May, the 22d Group completed sixteen
missions for a total of more than eighty sorties against Rabaul. Hits
were claimed on three transports, two merchant vessels, and one air-
craft carrier in addition to the destruction of at least sixteen aircraft
on the ground and ten in the air. The targets provided by the Lakunai
and Vunakanau airfields and the near-by harbor were vital ones, but
the distances were actually too great for the B-26. The last mission
was flown on 24 May-indeed it would be October 1943 before
Rabaul was attacked again by medium bombers-and the job was
turned over entirely to the heavies. During April, May, and June
the 19th Group itself mounted eighteen missions against Rabaul for
a total of approximately sixty sorties. Though unfavorable weather
and darkness often prevented anything like an accurate assessment
of results, gratifying fires and damage to at least two vessels were
r e p ~ r t e d . ~ ~Bombing missions to Rabaul, as to other points, also
served in a highly important way the ends of reconnaissance.
Through these months there had been few antishipping strikes,
except during the Coral Sea action of May and against vessels lying
480

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.