Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E P R O B L E M O F N E W G U I N E A
Between 24 April and 4 July, seventy B-25 sorties were flown
against Lae and Salamaua, to which number there were added eighty-
four B-26 sorties, forty-five by B - I ~ ’ s ,and twenty by RAAF Cata-
linas, Beauforts, and Hudsons. Insofar as was possible, the bombing
efforts of the several units were co-ordinated, as when, on 16 May,
fourteen B - 2 5 ’ ~and four B-26’s destroyed buildings, set fire to fuel
dumps, and damaged grounded aircraft at Lae. On 9 June, five B-25’s,
eleven B-26’s, and two B-17’s bombed the same target through an
overcast; and on 16 June, nine B-25’~,ten B-26’~,and three B-17’s
scored hits on runways and buildings. It was difficult to ascertain
the damage done. The weather was frequently unfavorable, and the
Japanese skillful at camouflage. Photographic reconnaissance indicated
that bombs often fell wide of the target, and the enemy continued
to add new taxiways and dispersal areas. But the Japanese never at
any time based their bombers in appreciable numbers a t either Lae
or Salamaua, and that was what counted. Indeed, Allied estimates,
based in part on information supplied by an RAAF officer who spent
months within sighting distance of Lae, indicated that enemy fighters
based on New Guinea rarely numbered more than forty.l9 These
were enough, however, to maintain a stubborn defense. Between 24
April and 4 July, three B-26’s and eleven B-25’s were lost in combat.
Especially heavy were the losses to an interception of 24 May. Eight
B-25’s of the 13th Squadron led by its commander, Capt. Herman F.
Lowery, and flying as usual without escort, cut through a pass in
the mountains, swept wide of Salamaua, and turned in toward Lae
from the east to be met head-on by a strong force of enemy fighters.
Six or seven of them were shot down, but Captain Lowery’s plane
burst into flames and dove into the ocean, and one by one four other
B-25’~went down. A sixth bomber crash-landed on its return to
Moresby.‘O As with the heavy bombers, Moresby served the mediums
only as a staging point.
More of the B-26’s would have been available for strikes at Lae
and Salamaua had it not been for the fact that during April and May
the 22d Group assumed a major responsibility for the run to Rabaul.
This, of course, was a job for the heavies, but on z April the 19th
Group had but six aircraft in commission, and through May and June
would average no more than seventeen B-17’s ready for combat, or
less than half its assigned strength. Moreover, one of its four squad-
rons, the 435th’ was reserved for reconnaissance duties, and repeatedly
479

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.