Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 537 …of Air Staff, Plans, Col. Orvil A. Anderson, had in preparation a study of the possibility…
  • p. 757 …Cole O d l e Anderson, CaPt. Ball, Capt. Moss, and himself. The im- portance of…
  • p. 770 …AFSHO files. 9. Lt. Col. O.A. Anderson, AWPD, Air Forces Estimate of the Situation, 1…
  • p. 797 …for C/AS from Col. O.A. Anderson, AC/AS, Plans, 25 June 1942. General Marshall…
  • p. 812 …for Col. George from Maj. S.E. Anderson, Research Regarding Bomber-Fighter Combats in Europe, 1…
  • p. 818 …AC/S, OPD from Col. O.A. Anderson, 10 July 1942. 197. Key Plan for the…
  • p. 840 …5 1 2 Andaman Is., 500, 503 Anderson, Col. 0. A., 472 Andes, 639 Andres, Pvt…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the rate of about three tons of cargo a week. Since this force repre-
sented the only ground unit, aside from guerrillas, actually engaged
in fighting the enemy, it was decided to supplement its supplies and
to provide reinforcements by air transport with a view toward launch-
ing an attack against Lae and Salamaua. This project was somewhat
delayed by bad weather and inability to provide fighter cover, but
on 2 2 May a flight by the 2 1st Troop Carrier Squadron inaugurated
a movement of about 300 troops and supplies. For more than a year
thereafter, the rough and sloping 3,300-foot runway at Wau served
as the most advanced terminal of Southwest Pacific transport opera-
tions. At the close of June, the small force at Wau even undertook
raids on the Japanese positions a t Lae and Salamaua.16
Efforts to make Lae and Salamaua as untenable for enemy bombers
as was Port Moresby for Allied bombers had been inaugurated by
the A-24’s of the 8th Squadron a t the opening of April. But prior
to their withdrawal at the end of May to Charters Towers, the A-24’s
flew only four combat missions, totaling twenty-nine sorties, from
Port Moresby. Though only two were lost in combat as against
claims of six enemy planes destroyed on the ground and two shot
down, operational losses were high. On 4 April, of the forty-two
dive bombers assigned to the Allied Air Forces, only twenty-two were
in commission; two months later, only twelve out of twenty-six.17
Designed originally as a carrier-borne plane and seemingly unequal
to the rough wear of imperfect fields, of relatively short range and
slow speed, and highly vulnerable except when provided with better
escort than was possible at Port Moresby, the A-24 was written off
by AAF personnel as unsuited to the type of operations required in
New Guinea, perhaps mistakenly in view of its subsequent record in
Navy hands.
Not unnaturally, the AAF came to place greater confidence in the
more rugged B-25. The early “C” model of the Mitchell Army
bomber had approximately three times the range of an A-24, could
carry more than twice its bomb load, had two more .50-cal. machine
guns, and was faster. Ever popular with Army flyers and locally
dubbed a “luxury liner,” it proved well suited to the hazardous
flights across the Owen Stanley Mountains. The only trouble was
that there were not enough B-25’s. Only fourteen originally had
been available under the Dutch contract, and by August there were
still only seventeen on hand.I8
478

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.