Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E P R O B L E M O F N E W G U I N E A
of both land-based and carrier-borne planes.s It was an ambitious
proposal, indeed too ambitious for the means then a t hand, but it
indicated a line of thought in the War Department that on broad
principle would be favorable to General MacArthur's immediate
proposal and to the development of tactics he would subsequently
follow in the Southwest Pacific.
But the Navy, apparently concerned over the prospect of com-
mitting its forces between New Guinea and the Solomons while the
enemy held the latter, objected to MacArthur's proposal that the
New Britain area should be an immediate objective. It had proposed,
rather, an initial conquest of Tulagi by South Pacific forces supported
by those of the Southwest Pacific.' The introduction of this alterna-
tive into the discussion posed, among other difficulties, a knotty
problem of command; for Tulagi under the original directive to
MacArthur fell within the Southwest Pacific, and it was evident
that the Navy anticipated that, even so, it might control an operation
to be mounted in the South Pacific against the Solomons. Such a
command arrangement, in fact, had become formally a part of the
Navy plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint
Chiefs a proposal that Vice Adm. Robert L. Ghormley, who had
been in command of the South Pacific since 19 June, should be
given command of an operation for seizure of Santa Cruz and Tulagi
on the understanding that General MacArthur would assume control
of its subsequent development into an attack on the Japanese position
in New Guinea and New Britain.6
Though MacArthur had protested that his own plan for direct
action against Rabaul presupposed the establishment of an air su-
premacy that would remove the grounds of the Navy's objection, and
though he warned against the dangers of divided command, Admiral
King's proposal offered the basis of a workable compromise.' Ac-
cordingly, on 2 July the Joint Chiefs issued a directive which defined
their policy with reference to the Japanese threat in terms of three
tasks.' Task one, the occupation of Santa Cruz and Tulagi, would
be executed under the command of Admiral Ghormley with such
support from air and naval units of the Southwest Pacific as could
be rendered. T o remove jurisdictional uncertainties which might
hamper the effort, the boundary between the South and Southwest
Pacific theaters would be moved westward as of I August to the
159th meridian, a line that would place within the South Pacific all
473

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.