Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 537 …of Air Staff, Plans, Col. Orvil A. Anderson, had in preparation a study of the possibility…
  • p. 757 …Cole O d l e Anderson, CaPt. Ball, Capt. Moss, and himself. The im- portance of…
  • p. 770 …AFSHO files. 9. Lt. Col. O.A. Anderson, AWPD, Air Forces Estimate of the Situation, 1…
  • p. 797 …for C/AS from Col. O.A. Anderson, AC/AS, Plans, 25 June 1942. General Marshall…
  • p. 812 …for Col. George from Maj. S.E. Anderson, Research Regarding Bomber-Fighter Combats in Europe, 1…
  • p. 818 …AC/S, OPD from Col. O.A. Anderson, 10 July 1942. 197. Key Plan for the…
  • p. 840 …5 1 2 Andaman Is., 500, 503 Anderson, Col. 0. A., 472 Andes, 639 Andres, Pvt…
T H E P R O B L E M O F N E W G U I N E A
of both land-based and carrier-borne planes.s It was an ambitious
proposal, indeed too ambitious for the means then a t hand, but it
indicated a line of thought in the War Department that on broad
principle would be favorable to General MacArthur's immediate
proposal and to the development of tactics he would subsequently
follow in the Southwest Pacific.
But the Navy, apparently concerned over the prospect of com-
mitting its forces between New Guinea and the Solomons while the
enemy held the latter, objected to MacArthur's proposal that the
New Britain area should be an immediate objective. It had proposed,
rather, an initial conquest of Tulagi by South Pacific forces supported
by those of the Southwest Pacific.' The introduction of this alterna-
tive into the discussion posed, among other difficulties, a knotty
problem of command; for Tulagi under the original directive to
MacArthur fell within the Southwest Pacific, and it was evident
that the Navy anticipated that, even so, it might control an operation
to be mounted in the South Pacific against the Solomons. Such a
command arrangement, in fact, had become formally a part of the
Navy plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint
Chiefs a proposal that Vice Adm. Robert L. Ghormley, who had
been in command of the South Pacific since 19 June, should be
given command of an operation for seizure of Santa Cruz and Tulagi
on the understanding that General MacArthur would assume control
of its subsequent development into an attack on the Japanese position
in New Guinea and New Britain.6
Though MacArthur had protested that his own plan for direct
action against Rabaul presupposed the establishment of an air su-
premacy that would remove the grounds of the Navy's objection, and
though he warned against the dangers of divided command, Admiral
King's proposal offered the basis of a workable compromise.' Ac-
cordingly, on 2 July the Joint Chiefs issued a directive which defined
their policy with reference to the Japanese threat in terms of three
tasks.' Task one, the occupation of Santa Cruz and Tulagi, would
be executed under the command of Admiral Ghormley with such
support from air and naval units of the Southwest Pacific as could
be rendered. T o remove jurisdictional uncertainties which might
hamper the effort, the boundary between the South and Southwest
Pacific theaters would be moved westward as of I August to the
159th meridian, a line that would place within the South Pacific all
473

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.