Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
was the Takao, whose gunners shot down Mansfield’s B-17; only one
survivor of the aircrew was recovered by the Japanese.138
The final attempt to attack the task force came when Captain Marks
informed the B-26’s on Umnak of the target’s precise location. Five
B-26’s took off a t 2040 led by Captain Meals, and three aircraft located
the carriers. T w o torpedoes were launched, and it was believed at the
time they had scored a t least one hit on a cruiser. Actually they failed
to hit, and the carrier escaped as well.lS9So ended the Dutch Harbor
episode. For the US. forces on Unalaska Island, it represented a loss
of 2 2 , 0 0 0 barrels of Diesel oil, some destruction from fire, forty-three
dead a t Dutch Harbor (thirty-three of them Army personnel), and
about fifty wounded.14’ For the AAF, it meant the loss of two P-40’s
in action, one B-17 down in combat, one B-26 lost, one damaged by
antiaircraft fire, one wrecked in landing, one LB-30 wrecked at
Kodiak on its return from Elmendorf. Perhaps the most critical loss
was that of radar equipment, for which spare parts were not available
except a t the cost of sets scheduled for delivery to the South Pacific
bases.141The Navy’s patrolling PBY-sA’s had suffered very severe
losses to the Zekes, ko severe that on 4 June, after forty hours of almost
continuous operations in wretched weather, pilots and crews were
at the limit of their endurance and only fourteen planes remained
operative.”*
On the side of the enemy, it is probable that he achieved about all
he had hoped for; losses were light, no damage had been incurred in any
of the attacks, and the way was open for landing on the outer Aleu-
tians. After recovering all surviving planes, the task force retired to
a point about 600 miles south of Kiska where it was joined by the
carrier Zuiho plus the Kongo and the Harum, which had come up
from Midway, and together these forces cruised south of Kiska for
ten days to screen the landing These, including a special
naval landing force of 5 5 0 men and 700 labor troops, had gone ashore
on Kiska on 6 June, but only after some debate on the part of Admiral
Yamamoto, who had seen his carriers destroyed a t Midway on the 4th.
Well aware of the significance of the grievous losses at Midway, ap-
parently he had canceled the entire Aleutian landing operation, then
yielded to his staff, which persuaded him to return to the original
plan, with the result that the Kiska landing proceeded without further
opposition, followed by additional landings on Attu on 7 June.144
469

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.