Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
this there is some positive evidence. Reports reached the Yamato that
a vessel was hurt, but thereafter the damage seems to have been
inflicted almost exclusively by dive bombers. Certainly the enemy
feared them most. During the engagement on the qth, the battleship
H m n a received some slight damage to her stern plates from a near
miss and it is possible that this damage might have come from heavy
bombers, but the survivors of that ship are positive that dive bombers
hurt thern.lo5 O n the afternoon of the same day, crews of the six
bombers which attacked a t 3,600 feet were positive that they scored a
hit on a destroyer; enemy records indicate that one such vessel was
damaged, but they fail to reveal the source of the bomb. Beyond this
point it is not possible to go, and the claims must remain hidden in the
fog of war. Vessels already afire when brought under attack by the
B-17’s did not easily lend themselves to accurate determination of
direct bomb hits from observers 15,000 to ~0,000feet in the air. How-
ever, even though the heavies had not scored many direct hits, Japa-
nese officers asserted that the B-17’s had caused the enemy craft to
break up their formations as they maneuvered radically to avoid the
falling bombs, thereby decreasing their power of mutual support and
leaving them more vulnerable to dive-bomber attack.lo6 It is possible
that a higher score might have been achieved had B- I 7 pilots and bom-
bardiers approached the action in a less exhausted state and had they
been permitted to train adequately in the months prior to Midway
rather than devote most of their time to search, but the subsequent
events of the Pacific war would indicate otherwise. Japanese ships a t
sea would not be sunk or hit with any degree of success until the
attacking eplanes were brought down to minimum levels.
T h e impact of Midway upon the concept of Pacific air war held by
the Navy and the AAF was considerable, setting off a train of debate
which continued long after the sea battle had ended. In the light of
the Japanese evidence and because of the very limited number of
B- I 7’s involved, there can be little question that AAF contribution
was insufficient to check the enemy’s advance. Torpedo planes of both
services had suffered costly losses, and the dive bomber had won the
day. But the AAF B- I 7 had proved itself superior to the PBY in ful-
filling the vital requirement of continuous tracking. Both types could
search the sea; yet once the contact was made, it was the B- I 7 rather
than the PBY which could stand up to strong enemy air opposition
and cling to the contact. Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi-
461

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.