Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
this there is some positive evidence. Reports reached the Yamato that
a vessel was hurt, but thereafter the damage seems to have been
inflicted almost exclusively by dive bombers. Certainly the enemy
feared them most. During the engagement on the qth, the battleship
H m n a received some slight damage to her stern plates from a near
miss and it is possible that this damage might have come from heavy
bombers, but the survivors of that ship are positive that dive bombers
hurt thern.lo5 O n the afternoon of the same day, crews of the six
bombers which attacked a t 3,600 feet were positive that they scored a
hit on a destroyer; enemy records indicate that one such vessel was
damaged, but they fail to reveal the source of the bomb. Beyond this
point it is not possible to go, and the claims must remain hidden in the
fog of war. Vessels already afire when brought under attack by the
B-17’s did not easily lend themselves to accurate determination of
direct bomb hits from observers 15,000 to ~0,000feet in the air. How-
ever, even though the heavies had not scored many direct hits, Japa-
nese officers asserted that the B-17’s had caused the enemy craft to
break up their formations as they maneuvered radically to avoid the
falling bombs, thereby decreasing their power of mutual support and
leaving them more vulnerable to dive-bomber attack.lo6 It is possible
that a higher score might have been achieved had B- I 7 pilots and bom-
bardiers approached the action in a less exhausted state and had they
been permitted to train adequately in the months prior to Midway
rather than devote most of their time to search, but the subsequent
events of the Pacific war would indicate otherwise. Japanese ships a t
sea would not be sunk or hit with any degree of success until the
attacking eplanes were brought down to minimum levels.
T h e impact of Midway upon the concept of Pacific air war held by
the Navy and the AAF was considerable, setting off a train of debate
which continued long after the sea battle had ended. In the light of
the Japanese evidence and because of the very limited number of
B- I 7’s involved, there can be little question that AAF contribution
was insufficient to check the enemy’s advance. Torpedo planes of both
services had suffered costly losses, and the dive bomber had won the
day. But the AAF B- I 7 had proved itself superior to the PBY in ful-
filling the vital requirement of continuous tracking. Both types could
search the sea; yet once the contact was made, it was the B- I 7 rather
than the PBY which could stand up to strong enemy air opposition
and cling to the contact. Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi-
461

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.