Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
Marine ground forces on the i~1and.O~Finally, at 0904 on the morning
of 3 June, the searchers made the first contact when a patrol plane
picked up two enemy cargo vessels 470 miles west of Midway. The
stage was set.
What followed was perhaps the most important single engagement
of the Pacific naval war. Excepting the role of the submarines, it was
exclusively an air-surface action involving the planes of both services,
and in which most of the damage to the enemy was inflicted by the
dive bombers of the carriers. Superficially, it was the first test of the
B-17’s as defensive weapons against attacking surface forces, and
the first occasion on which the heavy bombers based on Hawaii were
pushed out to forward island bases to strike at the enemy in defense
of the mid-Pacific. Here, it seemed, was an opportunity a t last to test
out one of the cherished beliefs of many of the heavy bomber expo-
nents: that the B- I 7’s could stop the carriers.Q4
Preliminaries to the Battle of Midway opened on the afternoon of
3 June, when at I 62 3 nine B- I 7E’s led by Lt. Col. Walter C. Sweeney,
Jr., of the 43 1st Bombardment Squadron surprised the transport force
with its supporting craft some 5 7 0 miles west of Midway, dropping
36 x 600-lb. demolition bombs from 8,000 feet. T h e claims were sub-
stantial, including five direct hits and several near misses; they were
representative of the scores credited after the subsequent missions of
the engagement, for Maj. Gen. Willis H. Hale, who became com-
mander of the Seventh Air Force on 20 June, firmly believed that a
fair percentage of the bombs had struck home. Assessment was difficult
and in part was based upon the statements of the handful of enemy
survivors picked up after the action; not until the war ended and the
teams of interrogators invaded Japan was it possible to interview a
number of the survivors of this initial action. And even their testimony
had suffered from the destruction of records, from the lapse of three
and one-half years between the action and interrogation, and from
the fact that the Japanese officers reporting were not always aware of
the source of the bombs which were dropped upon them. But their
evidence indicates the necessity of a radical scaling down of the origi-
nal claims as sent in by the Seventh Air Force. At any rate, in some
cases these enemy officers stood on the decks of the targets and were
in a fair way to determine when and by whom they were bombed,
better perhaps than pilots who bombed from zo,ooo feet and saw tall
geysers spout up around their rapidly maneuvering targets, for it has
45 7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.