Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
imperial general staff to the plan. After some discussion, the views of
the admirals prevailed and the enormous collection of surface power
was set in motion. Beyond Midway lay Hawaii; perhaps it, too, could
be brought under attack at a later date if all went well. At any rate,
it was believed that successful occupation of Midway would increase
the probability of drawing out American heavy
Back at Pearl Harbor, Adm. Chester Nimitz, commander in chief
of the Pacific Ocean Area, could not know of the debates in the upper
levels of the Japanese command. However, by I 5 May naval decoders
and intelligence officers were aware that a blow was coming. They
knew that an attempt would be made to occupy Midway and points in
the Aleutians, although nothing was known as to enemy intentions
against Hawaii, a point upon which the Japanese themselves were
uncertain. The exact date of the offensive was not known, but it was
believed that the fleet would begin to move out from Japan and Saipan
around 20 May.75 For Admiral Nimitz, there was a very slender
margin of time remaining in which to mobilize all possible defenses.
There was no assurance that the three carriers in the South Pacific
could be returned to Hawaii in time to protect Midway, and it was
necessary to meet the threat to Alaska by dispatching northward all
available spare combat ships, a force which included five cruisers and
four destroyers.'' AAF participation in the approaching battle would
be the responsibility of the Seventh Air Force, whose units were
receiving reinforcements from the West Coast, but whose strength
Maj. Gen. Robert C. Richardson, after extended conferences with
Nimitz and Emmons, still regarded as inadequate to assure the security
of the Alaska-Hawaii-Samoa-Australia line."
T h e Japanese had dealt the Hawaiian Air Force a devastating blow
on 7 December, destroying its planes, its equipment, and over zoo of
its personnel, losses demanding the most rapid possible replacement.
But despite all the reinforcements which had come out to the islands
in December following the Japanese attack, the Seventh Air Force,
as it was designated on 5 February, was not yet an offensive air force-
it would not acquire this status until November 1943. For the pres-
ent, it would remain a holding force which by January could report
the presence of 43 heavy bombers, 24 light and medium bombers, and
203 pursuit planes. These would have to suffice. In the ensuing four
months, no more planes were to be sent to Hawaii; in fact, twelve of
the heavies were withdrawn during February and dispatched to the
452

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.