Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
land-based planes had carried out extensive reconnaissance of the
Solomons area from New Ireland southeastward to the eastern bound-
ary of the Southwest Pacific Area: they flew armed patrols along the
New Guinea coast eastward to the Louisiade islands and thence west-
ward to Port Moresby, over the Coral Sea west of Tulagi, through-
out the Bismarck Archipelago, across the mouth of the Gulf of
Carpentaria, and in the Darwin area. Operations were hampered
somewhat by unfavorable weather, by the great distances which had
to be flown, by the absence of fighter protection for bombers, and by
the inability of the B-17'~to hit rapidly moving surface targets from
high altitudes when bombing singly or in small flights6? The entire
action had indicated a lack of co-ordination between the Navy and
the AAF which under different circumstances might have cost the
Navy more serious damage than it suffered a t the hands of the Japa-
nese, for in the Coral Sea, some of the AAF planes had dropped their
bombs upon friendly ships.
One week after the battle, General MacArthur reported that com-
plete co-ordination with naval forces had been attained.68 Yet, if
co-ordination did exist, it was at a point which never reached the
aircrews, for on the operational level there was little or none, and this
was a factor which had hampered the forces in Australia in their
attempts to operate with the Navy. Men of the 19th Group were
forced to admit that they had attacked U.S. naval units, but they
pointed to a reason. Few of them had received adequate training in
recognition of surface craft as they fought through the Philippines and
Java campaigns, but more important, none of the intelligence officers
had any information as to the location of the friendly task forces; nor
had any identification signals with surface craft been established
bef~rehand.~'This lack of information on naval plans worked a very
real hardship on the bombardment commanders. Prior to the May
battle, they were unaware either of the Navy's presence or of its
plans. They knew only that occasionally they would be requested on
short notice to co-operate in a naval operation, but because the strik-
ing force was widely scattered along the rail line between Townsville
and Cloncurry, it was necessary to fly the aircraft some 600 to 800
miles to Port Moresby, where they were refueled in preparation for
missions at dawn on the following day. However, it was necessary for
them to reach Moresby by dusk, for otherwise there was inadequate
time for the refueling necessary to comply with the Navy's request."
450

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.