Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
reconnaissance planes had sighted the enemy's Moresby force only a
few miles from the position first reported by the Y o r k t o ~ ' sscow;
when this information was passed on to the carriers' attack groups, the
latter altered their course slightly, then dive-bomber and torpedo
planes went on to put their missiles on the Shoho, which they found
approximately 2 0 miles northeast of Misima.61 Hit by dive bombers,
the Shoho lost her steering gear; within a few minutes she had taken
a number of torpedoes, capsized and sunk, carrying with her about 500
of her crew of 1 , 2 0 0 . ~ ~Next day the U.S. carrier pilots met the
enemy's main support force, which had swept around to the south of
San Cristobal, and in a major air engagement the dive bombers struck
the Shokaku at least twice, damaging her severely, although the Zui-
kaku managed to escape both bombs and torpedoe~.'~With the Shoho
gone, the aviation fuel supply short on the Zuikaku, and knowing that
U.S. cruiser strength was undamaged, the Japanese turned northward,
for their main fleet was now in Japan after recently completing an
operation against Ceylon."*
Allied forces had lost the Lexington a t a time when that carrier
could hardly be spared; also they had lost the oiler Neosho and the
destroyer Sims, together with 66 planes. Tactically, it would seem
that the task force barely had gained a draw, perhaps not even that,
but strategically it had done much better; it had saved Port Moresby
from a frontal assault. The Japanese now had one carrier less to use
elsewhere, and the Shokaku would go to the repair yards rather than
to Midway. The effects of this engagement would be demonstrated
in the future. Meanwhile, the Japanese army prepared to restate its
claim upon Moresby, except that now, with the sea road made
impassable, it would try the overland trail south across Papua from
Buna, planning to occupy Moresby by July."6
The Battle of the Coral Sea had involved forces both from the
carriers and from AAF units based in Australia, but it was apparent at
once that the contribution of the AAF had been of a limited nature;
in fact, it is probable that its reconnaissance work was of greater im-
portance than its tactical work in bombardment. Heavy and medium
bombers had flown numerous armed reconnaissance missions from
Townsville up to Port Moresby, and B- I 7's had attacked the Moresby
transports on 7 May, repeating the attack on the 8th, although enemy
reports indicate that they inflicted no damage in either case.66In addi-
tion to participation in the engagement out over the Coral Sea, the
449

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.