Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
highest councils: where were they to draw the final perimeter with
its outermost line of defenses? The question was of vital importance,
for it determined in large part the locale of the initial clashes with
U.S. forces as soon as the inevitable counterattacks began. Generally,
it was the imperial navy which stressed the advantages of establishing
a perimeter at the maximum possible distance from the industrial heart
of the empire; for not only would this plan provide additional time
and space in which to fend off American assaults which were sure to
come, but it served Admiral Yamamoto’s strong conviction that his
only hope of success lay in bringing about an early full-dress naval
engagement with American forces. The aggressive commander of the
Japanese Combined Fleet favored this decisive fleet action at the
earliest possible date, because he realized that with the passage of
time American production would outstrip that of Japan, thereby
creating a fatal disparity between the two naval establishment^.^^ The
Japanese army, on the other hand, seems to have opposed this tend-
ency toward overexpansion in the Pacific, stressing the advantages of
maintaining a tight, compact empire operating along interior lines,
fed by the resources of the Netherlands East Indies and defended on
the east by a naval force whose commitments were more nearly in
proportion to its strength. The latter plan did not prevail. It was the
navy’s theory which gradually gained ascendency, and by March and
April both army and navy were examining their outposts in the east
and south with a view to strengthening them.
If the Japanese in their planning conducted prior to the war had
hesitated to rush too far afield in fixing the limits of empire, the
results of the first four months of fighting indicated that their initial
calculations and timetables had been exceeded; the victories had come
easily, the cost had been inconsiderable, and Allied resistance had
proved unexpectedly light.5oThis very ease and rapidity of conquest
seems to have been a strong factor in influencing the Japanese navy
toward fresh ventures in the spring of 1 9 4 2 . ~ ~The first step occurred
in connection with the defense of Rabaul, the strategic base located
at the junction of New Britain and the upper Solomons which the
navy had marked out as one of its goals prior to the outbreak of the
war. The place had been taken on 23 January, together with Kavieng
on New Ireland, but there was a difference of opinion as to how it
should be strengthened; the question was not whether the Rabaul
base should have its own advance posts, but how many and at what
446

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.