Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E IN T H E PACIFIC
remain in the Far East under the control of General S t i l ~ e l l . ~ ~Gep-
era1 Arnold chose the leader of the expedition. H e was Lt. Col. James
H. Doolittle, and his 24 crews were selected from the 34th, 37th,
and 95th squadrons of the 17th Bombardment Group” and from the
89th Reconnaissance Squadron. All were volunteers, and there was
no effort to hand-pick the personnel; they represented average flight
crews of the AAF.
Execution of the plan would place a heavy burden upon the air-
craft. A cruising range of 2,400 miles with a 2,ooo-lb. bomb load
would be demanded of whatever plane was chosen, and after due
consideration for the merits of the B-26 and the B-25, the choice
fell upon North American’s B-25. At Eglin Air Depot auxiliary fuel
tanks were fitted into the planes, after removal of the lower turrets,
and when all additional capacity was filled, including an extra fifty
gallons carried internally in five-gallon tins and a collapsible 160-
gallon rubber bag in the crawlway, the planes carried 1,141 gallons,
of which the pilots could count on 1.100. T o lift this weight plus
the bomb load off the deck of a carrier presented a problem never
before challenged by Army planes. Hence an accelerated training
program was instituted at Eglin Field, Florida, where the bombers
had arrived by I March, and where Lt. Henry F. Miller, USN, in-
structed the pilots in the technique of short take-offs. White lines
on the ground marked out the distances for the pilots, and before
concluding the training period, all of them had taken off twice
in a 700- to 75o-foot run with a plane loaded to 31,000 pounds;
they were confident that they could take off from a carrier in
their heavy planes. They were to leave behind their Norden bomb-
sights so ;hat they would not fall into enemy hands. In their place
Capt. C. R. Greening designed a simple substitute device which
he labeled the “Mark Twain,” and this was the bombsight car-
ried on the mission. For “protection” from astern, two wooden
.5o-cal. machine guns were installed in the extreme tip of the tail,
and, to record the flight, each plane carried either a still or a movie
camera.
Bombing training was conducted primarily from I ,500-foot alti-
tudes, with the planes approaching at minimum level, then making a
quick pull up to the desired level; but there was scarcely any time for
adequate gunnery practice. Nevertheless, on 24 March the detach-
* At that time assigned to the Eighth Air Force. See below, p. 614.
439

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.