Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 383 …M Y A I R F O R G E S - 3 0 J U N…
  • p. 504 @ L A N D I N G F I E L D S + T A R…
  • p. 628 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 630 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 632 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 634 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 636 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 638 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 640 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 642 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 644 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 646 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 648 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 652 5 C HEMAT IC 0 R G AN IZAT I0 N U.S. ARMY AIR FORCES…
  • p. 654 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 656 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 658 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 660 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 662 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 664 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 666 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 668 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 670 P L A N S , POLICIES, A N D O R G A N I Z…
  • p. 672 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 674 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 676 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 678 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 680 …I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I…
  • p. 751 …Memo for Henry H. Arnold from Maj. R.G. Hoyt, 1 1 Mar. 1936.) 194.J…
  • p. 807 …Mar. 1942; CCS y6/1, 6 Mar. r g q . 19. Memo for C/AAF from…
  • p. 842 …mass flight to UK, 641-45; test ( r g j f ) , 53; test against attacking ves…
  • p. 850 …Howell commission, 30-3 I Hoyt, Col. R.G., 420 Hudson. See A-29. Hughes, Lt…
  • p. 855 …189, O'Donnell Field, 186 Oestreichcr, Lt. R. G., 393 Oklahoma, 197 Old, Col. W.D…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
precipitated the war, the US. Navy had taken a stand against im-
mediate and large-scale preparations for an offensive against Germany.
It considered that since the prime strength of the United Nations lay
in naval and air categories, profitable strategy should contemplate
effective employment of these forces; ground forces should be thrown
against regions where Germany could not exert the full power of her
armies. Application of this policy obviously pointed to the Pacific as
the preferred area of operations. The Army, on the other hand, held
the opinion that such strategy might not accomplish the defeat of
Germany and that it would be necessary to challenge German armies
on the continent of Europe."
At the same time, there was general agreement between the services
that if Australia and New Zealand were to be supported the sea and
air communications which pass through the South Pacific must be
made secure. Australia and New Zealand were vital as bases for future
operations, and loss of either or both would vastly multiply the diffi-
culties of any future offensive against Japan." Samoa was recognized
as occupying an important linking position; it must be held, as must
the bases so rapidly reaching a state of completion on the smaller
islands along the way. In their conclusion the Joint Chiefs of Staff
squarely faced the problem which was destined to plague all future
discussion of air power for the Pacific: because of the shortage of
shipping and the current lack of large forces in various categories,
any strengthening of the deployment against Japan would be at the
expense of the effort which otherwise might be thrown against Ger-
many. It was concluded that the forces for offensive action in the
United Kingdom and those for defensive action in the Pacific should
be built up simultaneously.3o
With these hard facts before them, Army and Navy representatives
made their initial over-all recommendations for all the island bases
between Hawaii and Australia, and their suggested allocations went
well beyond those proposed by the Combined Chiefs back in January.
The strengths for Christmas and Canton remained the same, twenty-
five pursuit aircraft in each case; Palmyra would become completely
a naval responsibility, as would Borabora and as Samoa was in the
earlier plan. Tongatabu now was an AAF base for twenty-five pur-
suits, and Efate was similarly designated as a base for an AAF pursuit
squadron of equal strength." But in the case of Fiji and New Cale-
* See map, p. 429.
436

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.