Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E L I N E I N T H E P A C I F I C
shipment to the Fijis were 1,660 Army service troops, naval forces
totaling 1,800 (1,500 for an air base detail, including personnel for
one aircraft carrier group and for twenty-five PBY's, and 300 for
local defense of ships and installations), and the flying echelon of the
70th Bombardment Squadron (M), which was expected to arrive in
July.24Already the ground echelon of the squadron had sailed from
Brisbane on 17 May.z5
With the gradual establishment of strong American forces in New
Caledonia, in the adjacent New Hebrides, which once had been con-
sidered as an alternate to New Caledonia, and in the Fiji Islands, the
prospects of holding the lines of communication between Australia
and the United States-and consequently the outlook for the forces in
Australia-became much brighter. In order to make the Allied position
even more secure, a joint Army-Navy plan was instituted for re-
inforcing Tongatabu, 500 miles southwest of Samoa and the southern-
most island of the Tonga group. So long as the line New Caledonia-
Fiji-Samoa was maintained, it was improbable that Tongatabu would
be attacked by a major enemy force; but the base could be of
extreme strategic importance as an alternate staging point between
the United States and the Southwest Pacific Area, and as an outpost
to prevent enemy attacks upon the Fijis and Samoa from the south.*'
It was therefore planned that Army troops totaling 292 officers, 6,189
enlisted men, and 52 nurses, and naval forces totaling 83 officers and
1,689 enlisted men who would be withdrawn upon completion of
the air base, would sail from the United States about 6 April, while
air force units totaling 58 officers and 606 enlisted men were to be
taken from the American forces in Australia and dispatched in order
to arrive at Tongatabu by 1 5 May. In conformance with this plan, the
68th Pursuit Squadron sailed from Brisbane on 8 May, disembarking
at Tongatabu on the 17th; seventeen days later, the last of the squad-
ron's twenty-five P-40Es had been assembled and test-flown."
T h e Qziestion of lsland Defense
As the ground, naval, and air forces moved to their stations along
the island chain, it was apparent that there was no clear agreement
in Washington as to the ultimate strength necessary to hold these
bases. This confusion over the statistics of defense arose from a larger
disagreement over the relative importance of war in the Pacific with
respect to the global war. Even prior to the Japanese attack which
435

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.