Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Wake carried one Japanese outpost to a point less than 1,200 miles
from Midway, and both islands lay squarely astride the central Pacific
air route to the Far East.
Defense of the South Pacific Route
It has been indicated elsewhere that the fear of just such a loss of
the central Pacific bases had driven Air Corps planners to push hard
for an alternate line through the islands of the South Pacific. By the
spring of 1942,their efforts were approaching completion and the
route across the islands was usable; actually, the trail-blazing flight
had been made in January. But establishment of the operating facilities
alone was not the only claim placed upon the resources of the Allies
by the island bases; unless adequate defenses were provided for these
Pacific steppingstones, the southern line to Australia might well be cut
even as the northern route had been blocked. The attempt to reinforce
the Philippines by sending planes eastward across the South Atlantic
and Africa, thence on to India and down through the Netherlands
East Indies, carried with it a prohibitive attrition rate. Furthermore,
the fall of the Indies to the Japanese in February and March had
placed the enemy athwart this route and threatened possible air lanes
across the Indian Ocean, so that now nothing remained but the new
and untried path down through the South Pacific islands.
In their prior planning, Army and Navy commanders had devoted
scant attention to the problems of moving land-based aircraft across
Pacific atolls and islands, or of defending the bases which made such
movement possible. The Army and Navy Joint Board Estimate of
September 1941had ignored the necessity of such defense; the Philip-
pines were in US.hands and, accordingly, the board had planned to
concentrate land-based aviation in these islands and the Hawaiian
group.2 Elsewhere in Pacific waters it was assumed that the U.S. Navy
would restrain the Japanese, but this theory now was open to revision
in view of the fact that the bulk of what then was regarded as the
fleet’s offensive and defensive power lay fast in the mud at Pearl Har-
bor. Thus the island bases stood in more urgent need of local defense
than was originally appreciated, for there could be no assurance that
the enemy would terminate his expansion with the capture of Rabaul
or Wake; at this stage of the war it was the Japanese rather than the
Allies who determined the limits of enemy aggression.
Even though much of the U.S. striking power had been lost in the
428

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.