Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E D E F E N S E O F A U S T R A L I A
He showed greater concern, however, for modification of certain
features in both American and Australian organization that would pro-
vide a higher degree of flexibility in the employment of air units.
Though for a time an attempt was made to hold the American groups
intact, they were soon divided to provide individual squadrons for
defense of the more exposed areas, and General Brett came to feel
that the squadron rather than the group would prove the basic tactical
unit in later offensive operations. He proposed the establishment of
air headquarters in each defensive area, prepared to accept and operate
any number of squadrons assigned under a general plan to concentrate
tactical units in accordance with a changing tactical situation, and
with a view to providing a command structure that in itself would be
flexible enough to move forward in offensive operations as the occa-
sion required. Such a headquarters would remain in the original area
only for so long as it was necessary and then, in General Brett’s words,
“would leap-frog to take up a command a t some newly acquired
point.” 4 6 Inadequate personnel and other considerations made it im-
possible to follow this proposal, but General Brett sought greater
flexibility of control by the establishment on 4 May 1942 of U.S. Air
Commands No. I and No. 2 , located respectively in the northwest and
northeast defensive areas. Commanded by Col. Albert L. Sneed a t
Darwin and Brig. Gen. Martin F. Scanlon at Townsville, the two
headquarters were supposed to be prepared for direction of all types
of air operations. Actually, the American planes remained subject to
the control of the area commanders, and before the month was out the
two commands had been dissolved and their planes had been assigned
for operations, in the one instance, to the commanding general of the
land forces of the Northern Territory and, in the other, to the com-
mander of the New Guinea Force. Though it was understood that
these officers, who were themselves directly responsible to the com-
mander of the Allied Land Forces, would not interfere with a control
of air operations by air officers except in the event of an imminent
attack, there was a feeling among AAF personnel that an effective
organization remained yet to be attained.4T
On the other hand, there was cause for satisfaction with decisions
reached regarding the organization of air service. On 2 7 April ;i new
command, the United States Army Air Services under Maj. Gen.
Rush B. Lincoln, took over the responsibility for air service from
USAFIA. At first there was some confusion as to the extent and exact
42 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.