Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Herbert F. Leary, Commander of Allied Naval Forces; Lt. Gen.
Jonathan M. Wainwright, Commander of Forces in the Philippines;
and Maj. Gen. Julian F. Barnes, Commander of U.S. Army Forces in
Australia.’
General Brett assumed command of the Allied Air Forces on 2 0
April, with assignment to his command of the control of all AAF
tactical units and associated service elements of the U.S. Army then
in Australia, and operational control, except for training, of the
RAAF and the Royal Netherlands East Indies Army Air F ~ r c e . ’ ~The
necessity of adapting his plans to the existing defensive organization
of Australia, a shortage of American staff personnel, an unavoidable
dependence upon the RAAF for communications and administrative
facilities, and a purpose to merge the several components into a truly
unified force were reflected in a balance between Australian and
American officers in the air staff announced on 2 May as follows: Air
Vice Marshal William D. Bostock, RAAF, chief of staff; Col. Edwin
S. Perrin, deputy chief of staff; Brig. Gen. Ralph Royce, senior air
staff officer; Col. Eugene L. Eubank, director of plans; Col. Ross G.
Hoyt, director of operations; Air Commodore Joseph C. Hewitt,
RAAF, director of intelligence; Group Capt. F.R.W. Scherger,
RAAF, director of defense; and Group Capt. Carn S. Wiggins, RAAF,
director of communications.43
Actually, the extent of Australian influence was considerably greater
than at first glance would appear. General Brett a t no time held ad-
ministrative control of RAAF units, and AAF dependence on the
Australians gave to them a substantial degree of administrative and
even operational control of the American units. Australian administra-
tive forms, unfamiliar and frequently confusing to the Americans,
were used; Australian officers by virtue of rank filled a majority of
the key command positions at the bases from which the Americans
operated; operational control, moreover, would be implemented
through the five military areas into which Australia was divided, each
of which was commanded by an Australian ~fficer.~’Indeed, one of-
ficial report went so far as to describe Australian control as extending
to “every echelon of American Air Forces and every airfield at which
they are stationed.” ‘‘ Personal and official relations remained good,
but it was natural that General Brett should seek the assignment to
his command of American staff officers of sufficient experience and
rank to provide a better balance.
4 2 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.