Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R S E R V I C E I N W O R L D W A R I
fight a t a disadvantage. One day mission was sufficiently large and suc-
cessful to draw more than passing attention. O n 9 October, with some
French reinforcements, Mitchell was able to employ a force of about
2 0 0 bombers escorted by some I 10 pursuits and 50 three-place planes.
With these he attacked and disorganized German army reserves gath-
ering in the rear for a counterattack. T h e German air defense was
overwhelmed, and the area bombed with telling effect. Thirty-two
tons of bombs were dropped in this mission; subsequent operations
during the same day and the following night brought the total for
twenty-four hours to sixty-nine tons.sQIt was probably the Air Serv-
ice’s most notable bombardment effort during the war.
An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary
judgment of the importance of this mission:
T h e bombing squadrons which made up this air fleet probably represent the
first definite American unit of major importance in the independent air forces
which are being built up by the Entente powers. This navy of the air is to be
expanded until no part of Germany is safe from the rain of bombs. It is a thing
apart from the fighting, observation, and bombing squadrons attached to the
various army corps. T h e work of the independent force is bombing munitions
works, factories, cities, and other important centers far behind the German
lines. It has been promised that eventually Berlin itself will know what an
air raid means, and the whole great project is a direct answer to the German
air attacks on helpless and unfortified British, French, and Belgian cities.*O
When war ended, the Air Service had not begun such attacks. Their
total “rain of bombs” for the war was about 1 3 8 tons-or, to use the
more impressive figure of the official report, 275,000 pounds. Their
deepest penetration behind German lines was 160 miles.41 Even by
the correspondent’s own definition the attack of 9 October was hardly
an independent mission. T h e sudden collapse of Germany made him
a false prophet, but his predictions were better grounded than rhose of
early 1917.O n 6 June 1918the RAF’s Independent Force had been
established with its commander, Trenchard, directly responsible to
the Air Ministry. Its mission was strategic bombardment-in Germany
when possible-and its operations had slowly mounted in intensity.
T h e principle behind this organization had been grudgingly accepted
by the French, and on 3 October the constitution of an Inter-Allied
Independent Air Force, also directed by Trenchard but “under the
Supreme Command of Marshal Foch for operation,” had been agreed
upon.42T h e Air Service was to have participated in this combined
force, which was still a paper organization when the Armistice came.
‘ 5

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.