Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
reorganization. Col. John Davies and the few members of the 27th
Group who had escaped from the Philippines were flying some
twenty-nine A-24’~on patrol of the Darwin area. The 3d Bombard-
ment Group (L) having arrived both with crews and ground echelon,
it had been decided that this unit would absorb the personnel of the
27th Group. The experienced flyers of the latter organization, ac-
cordingly, were assigned to key positions in the other unit, and all
available A-24’s were used to equip its 8th Squadron. The 13th and
90th squadrons of the 3d Group began to receive at about the same
time B-zs’s, medium bombers originally intended for use by the
Dutch. The 89th Squadron, whose personnel was engaged in the per-
formance of service and maintenance for the 19th Group a t Charters
Towers, still awaited its allotted A-20kZ7Thus, the 3d Group had one
light bombardment squadron, two squadrons partially equipped with
medium bombers, and a fourth squadron whose knowledge of the
structure of a heavy bomber probably exceeded that of any other light
bombardment unit in the Army. The two medium bombardment
groups assigned were the 38th and the z2d. The ground echelon of
the former having arrived on 25 February, it had since then been
engaged in a study of infantry tactics and in the erecting of planes for
other organizations. It would be many months before its own planes
were received. O n the other hand, several B-26’s belonging to the 2zd
Group flew the Pacific to land at Archerfield on 25 March, and within
a month a total of forty-eight of the Marauders had come in from the
United States.’*
While the American flyers were being regrouped and prepared, the
RAAF continued its efforts to gain intelligence of the enemy’s move-
ments and wherever possible to harass him. During March, for ex-
ample, Darwin-based Hudsons, in addition to maintaining a regular
patrol of the Arafura Sea, flew more than twenty sorties against Dili
and Koepang in Timor. Other Hudsons and similarly slow and inade-
quately armed Catalinas wore themselves out on reconnaissance flights
and approximately thirty combat sorties against Rabaul, Gasmata, and
Salamaua. Total RAAF losses from combat during March were only
three Hudsons; more serious was the steady wear and tear on men
and machines.” Though the first Japanese attack of 19 February on
Darwin had been its most destructive, the port since then had been
under repeated attack, as also had been Port Moresby after its first
air raid on the night of 2/3 F e b r ~ a r y . ~ ’
4’4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.