Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E D E F E N S E O F A U S T R A L I A
Group was in any condition for immediate employment. T h e experi-
ence in Java had shattered the morale of their battle-wearied crews,
and the fourteen B-17’s rescued from the disaster there were all in
depot for repair. Indeed, the twelve B-I 7’s available for operations
were for the moment in the anomalous position of not being even
under American command. Both the planes and the crews, some of
which had flown into Oahu during the Japanese attack on 7 December,
belonged to the 2 2d Bombardment Squadron and the 88th Reconnais-
sance Squadron of the 7th Group, but after flying search missions out
of Hawaii for two months, they had been attached to Naval Task
Force ANZAC early in February for assistance in protection of the
South Pacific line of supply. Under the command of Maj. Richard H.
Carmichael, the flight had flown twelve missions from the Fiji Islands
prior to its arrival at Townsville in Australia on I 8 and I 9 February.
In the absence of official notification of their coming, USAFIA had
made no arrangements for maintenance, supply, or administration. For
a few days they had remained under naval control, during which time
six of the planes flew the first American bomber mission against Rabaul
on 2 3 February, and then they were transferred to control of the
RAAF.’5
By the end of March the heavy bomber situation had been some-
what clarified. Planes and crews of the 7th Group had been assigned
to the 19th, which, near Townsville, was in process of reorganization
and preparation for combat under the command of Lt. Col. Kenneth
B. Hobson. For the second heavy bombardment group committed to
Australia the choice had fallen on the 43d Group, and its ground
echelon had now arrived. But it would be months before the 43d
entered operations. AAF plans had called for dispatch of two B-17’s
a day to Australia after 2 0 March, with the purpose of building up
and maintaining a minimum of forty heavy bombers for each of the
two groups. T h e W a r Department subsequently decided, however,
to reconsider allocations to all theaters, and by the end of March only
nine of the bombers had reached Australia. A new decision on the
combined staff level did not appreciably alter the earlier commitment
to the Southwest Pacific. There would be eighty operational aircraft
with the addition of forty in reserve, but plans for their movement to
the theater called for the dispatch of only thirty in April and the
remainder as soon thereafter as was possible.26
Light bombardment units were also undergoing regrouping and
4’ 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.