Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
which was the 8th, had disembarked at Brisbane on 10 March, but
only the 49th Group, which had come in early in February, was con-
sidered ready for combat. The explanation for this and similar delays
in preparing other units is readily revealed by a glance at the level of
experience of the 49th’~1 0 2 pilots at the time of their arrival in the
theater. Lt. Col. Paul B. Wurtsmith, its commanding officer, and his
executive, Maj. Donald R. Hutchinson, were veteran pilots with 4,800
and 2,600 hours of pursuit time, respectively. Five other pilots had
more than 600 hours, and nine were credited with about 15 hours,
but the remaining eighty-nine pilots had no pursuit time at all.22As
for the 35th, its more experienced pilots had been drafted for service
with the provisional squadrons hurriedly organized for operation in
the Netherlands East Indies, and such of them as had survived had
been assigned to rest and recuperation in the hope that their battle
experience might soon be put to use in the training of other pilots.
Once again men struggled against the disadvantages that had beset
their efforts in the Philippines and then in the Netherlands East Indies.
They worked against time, enjoyed few of the benefits of previous
preparation, and improvised as they went, in an attempt to meet the
changing requirements of a highly fluid tactical situation. An organi-
zation geared to the requirements of service and supply for operations
in Java had to be readjusted to the tactical demands of a defense of
Australia, Once more it was necessary to integrate activities with those
of an ally; the Americans were dependent upon the Australians for
communications and were forced to rely heavily upon them in all
matters of administration; and once more good will on both sides was
in itself insufficient to overcome all of the difficulties. The penalties
of haste proved to be none the less because the haste was unavoidable.
Although General Brett early in January had urged upon the authori-
ties in Washington a policy of shipping the unit and its essential equip-
ment together, some organizations continued to arrive without their
equipment, with the result that days, and on occasion even weeks,
might pass before it could be Yet, within two weeks of the
final collapse of Allied resistance on Java, American pursuit units were
making their presence felt in the defense of Australia’s outposts.
Especially depressing was the bomber situation. With twenty-six
B-I~’s,forty-three A-24’~’and one or two each of the A-20’s and
B-25’s on hand, only twelve heavy and twenty-seven dive bombers
were in commission on 18 MarcheZ4Neither the 7th nor the 19th
4 1 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.