Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E D E F E N S E O F A U S T R A L I A
that to maintain a defensive position in Australia called not so much
for a new allocation of air strength as rather for the building up and
preparation of air forces already allocated to the area. Earlier plans
for the reinforcement of the Philippines and the desperate hope of
halting the Japanese advance through the Netherlands East Indies had
given Australia, as the base in support of both operations, a high
priority in the allocation of available men and planes. T h e South
Pacific route would have to be strengthened, but no addition was
made to an earlier commitment to the Southwest Pacific of one light,
two medium, and two heavy bombardment groups and of four pur-
suit groups. Indeed, the forces assigned to Australia would receive
additional responsibilities for the security of the South Pacific route;
and in March, General Brett received word that instead of four pur-
suit groups he might expect a total of only three.17 In command once
more of United States Army Forces in Australia, General Brett had
stated his needs at no less than six pursuit groups and three light, three
medium, and three heavy bombardment groups, to which he added
three transport groups.l8 But like other field commanders at this time,
he would have to do with less than he felt the situation required.
At the time MacArthur arrived from the Philippines, General Brett,
with a staff headed by General Barnes as deputy commander, was
engaged in an effort to prepare and deploy his forces for defense of
Australia. It was Brett’s feeling that air units must be stationed in each
of seven widely separated areas having their centers a t Darwin,
Townsville, Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, and Sydney.”
T h e position of chief of the air staff was held by Brig. Gen. Ralph
Royce, who had reached Java during the closing phase of operations
there.’O American strength in the air was composed chiefly of pursuit
planes. Although organized units considered ready for combat were as
yet few, there had arrived in Australia between 2 3 December 1941
and 18 March 1942 a total of 337 P-~o’s,more than I O O P-~oo’s,’ and
90 P-39’s. Of these planes, approximately 125 had been lost to enemy
action during the Java campaign, others had been lost by accident, 75
had been turned over to the RAAF, 74 were under repair or awaiting
repair, and approximately I 00 awaited complete assembly. O n I 8
March there were 33 P-39’s, 92 P-~o’s,and 5 2 P-400’s in commis-
sion.*’ T h e last of the three pursuit groups assigned to Australia,
gun in the nose instead of the 37-mm.
* An early export model of the P-39 with inferior characteristics, including a zo-mm.
4’ 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.