Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
himself and a small staff, called for a tremendous force of 1,500planes-
the largest air show of the whole war. Of the I ,48 I actually engaged,
only 609 were from American squadrons, the remainder being made
up of aircraft from the RAF’s Independent Force, the whole of the
French Air Division (strategic reserve), and Italian and Portuguese
units. Preparations for so large a battle could not be hidden completely,
but a certain degree of tactical surprise was achieved. Only about a
third of the aircraft were attached to the ground forces. The rest,
divided into two air brigades, struck alternately a t the right and left
flanks of the salient and at communications and supplies at the rear.
Local air superiority was maintained according to plan throughout
the battle, and the air component contributed effectively to the
American victory in spite of unfavorable eath her.^' Mitchell’s skill
in marshaling and controlling so large and heterogeneous a force was
surprising; in short, St.-Mihiel was as promising a debut for the Air
Service as for the First Army.
In the more extended Meuse-Argonne offensive of 2 6 September-I I
November, Mitchell was unable to rally so large a force, being usually
dependent upon American units only. The principle of concentration
which had been so successful at St.-Mihiel continued, however, to
guide his tactics. In the Meuse-Argonne it was the Americans who
occupied the salient and the German air force which struck at the
flanks, trying, in Mitchell’s words, to “make our infantry insist on
splitting up our pursuit aviation so as to give local protection every-
where.” Mitchell refused to “spread a thin veneer of airplanes all
along the front through which they could break easily a t any point
with a large group formation.” To intercept German “battle squad-
rons” of attack planes, the Americans organized a special branch of
their forces known as “low-flying pursuit.” Patrols of five planes each
were assigned ten-kilometer fronts. Flying at two levels and using
friendly antiaircraft fire to spot enemy intruders, the patrols proved
successful in breaking up their attacks on ground troops.
The rest of his offensive forces Mitchell concentrated along the axis
of the American advance. Since the Germans had numerical superior-
ity in the air and were flying in large formations, he used where pos-
sible a force of two groups of pursuits and one group of day bombers.
These struck at troop concentrations and communications and attacked
airdromes behind the lines with the purpose of destroying the enemy’s
installations and planes on the ground or forcing him to come up and
‘4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.