Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
of an early and vigorous offensive against Germany; (2) to concen-
trate forces against Germany with acceptance of the possibility of
losing all the Southwest Pacific; ( 3 ) to reinforce the Southwest Pacific
and related areas to a point sufficient to maintain a defensive position
while building up in the United Kingdom the forces required for
assumption of the offensive at the earliest possible date.15
It was a difficult decision. The Joint Chiefs of Staff had been
prompt to recognize Germany as the most potent of our enemies and
to shape their strategy accordingly. At the same time, the key impor-
tance of Australia to plans for containing the Japanese had been
recognized, and its loss, or even the loss of any considerable part of
it, obviously might call into question the whole of the defensive
strategy agreed upon for the Pacific. Australia herself was unequal to
the task of providing her own defense. The best equipped and trained
of her troops had not yet returned from the battlefields of the Middle
East, and her air force in Australia on the outbreak of hostilities in
the Pacific possessed hardly more strength than did the Dutch in the
Netherlands East Indies. In the air especially, the burden of defending
Australia would have to fall upon the Americans. At Darwin the
RAAF could muster two understrength squadrons of Hudsons, one
squadron of Wirraways, and two squadrons equipped with American
A-24's. Even less well defended was Port Moresby with two reduced
squadrons of Catalinas, one reduced squadron of Hudsons, and one
squadron of Wirraways." Small in population and lacking adequate
industrial facilities, Australia would be dependent largely on British
and American production for the immediate equipment of her units
with modern planes. Upon the Americans, too, would fall the main
responsibility for defense of the island chain running back from
Australia to provide and shield a line of communication with the
United States, The Japanese at Rabaul were in position to move down
the Solomons toward the New Hebrides and the Fijis with as much
ease as now they advanced down the coast of New Guinea toward
Port Moresby, and it was evident that air reinforcements would be
required in addition to those already taking position along the South
Pacific route." Once again the decision favored maintenance of a de-
fensive position in the Pacific in the hope that an early offensive might
be mounted against Germany.
Of assistance in reaching this decision, no doubt, was the belief
* For discussion of the problem, see Chap. 1 2 .
4'0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.