Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
L O S S O F N E T H E R L A N D S E A S T I N D I E S
four heavy bomber sorties were dispatched. But of these, four missions
involving a total of seventeen bombers were abortive because of un-
favorable weather, and twenty-nine sorties in six other efforts resulted
only in negative reports. O n the remaining five missions, claims were
entered for the sinking of two transports and two other vessels, but
bomber losses were high. On 2 2 January, one B-17 was destroyed
when it overshot the field at Palembang; two days later, three B-17's
were badly shot up by enemy aircraft; on 24 January, two €3- I 7's of an
eight-plane mission were lost in crash landings, and only three of the
eight returned safely to Malang. On 2 7 January, Maj. Stanley K. Rob-
inson, commander of the 7th Group, while leading his fifth mission
within a week was shot down and with his entire crew was killed
when thirty Japanese pursuits attacked the formation of four B-17's.~'
Among the missions flown were those of 2 8 and 29 January against
Kuala Lunipur and the Kuantan airfield in the Malay States by four
B-17's which staged out of Palembang. Though their absence of two
and a half days from Malang still further weakened the defense against
the enemy above Java, the planes apparently succeeded in scoring
numerous hits on runways and hangars at K ~ a n t a n . ~ ~
T h e enemy on 26 January had captured Kendari, and to that
point he promptly transferred the forces of the 2 1st Air Flotilla which
on 3 February opened the attack on Java 'itself by savage strikes at
Soerabaja, Madioen, and Malar~g.~'O n that day near Malang the
Japanese caught American bombers standing on the Singosari field
loaded for take-off, and while enemy bombs tore the runway, strafers
concentrated their fire on the planes. Four B- I 7's exploded or burned,
and a fifth was shot down ten miles south of Malang. At Soerabaja
another Japanese formation damaged Dutch naval installations;
destroyed three Catalinas on the water; and in shooting down a B-18,
killed in addition to its entire crew several sorely needed radar experts
and Major Straubel, who had recently succeeded to the command of
the 7th T h e damage at Madioen was less serious, but the out-
look for a defense of Java against similar and continuing attacks was
dismal indeed.
In the absence of radar equipment, the Dutch air warning service
depended upon ground observation stations connected by wire with
a control room at Soerabaja. It had been well organized, bu; of course
there could be no substitute for modern equipment. There was a great
shortage also of antiaircraft guns, which for the most part were con-
383

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.