Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A I R S E R V I C E I N W O R L D W A R I
flared up, and friction occurred with air officers who had been in
France for some time. There was as well mutual antipathy between
air and ground officers. The Air Service was loath to take advice from
men who resolutely refused to enter a plane; ground officers accused
the aviators of being temperamental, lacking in the “garden variety of
home-made discipline,” of substituting a “hodgepodge of independent
personalities for an ordered administration.” 2 5 Pershing spoke of
Foulois’ staff as comprising a “lot of good men running around in
circles.” 2 6 At any rate, they proved incapable of building an effective
organization; their failure, aggravated by production delays at home
and tardiness in French deliveries, threatened to wreck all projected
aviation schedules. It was I April 1918 before the first combat squad-
ron was assigned to the front. By the time the 1st Division got its
baptism of fire a t Cantigny on 28 May, Pershing could write in his
diary, “Our aviation doing well a t the front.” Only six squadrons had
then been sent forward; by promises of the previous spring, achieve-
ment of the 4,500-plane objective should have been in sight.27
Pershing, at the instigation of some of the air officers, instituted a
thorough reorganization which followed immediately that in the
United States. O n 29 May he appointed as Chief of Air Service Brig.
Gen. Mason M. Patrick, an engineer who had nzver been in an air-
plane. Other officers were transferred, lines of authority were made
more precise, and the whole administrative structure of the Air Serv-
ice was revamped.zs A more modest objective of 2 0 2 combat squad-
rons was substituted for the AEF Aviation Project of 386.’’ The
reorganization proved salutary, and with renewed efforts at home the
Air Service was able to accelerate the rate of deployment of combat
units. By Armistice Day forty-five squadrons had been assigned to
the front.”
But with delays at home and in the AEF’s Zone of the Interior, the
combat echelon could hardly assume the decisive role so confidently
predicted in the spring of 1917. Even a t the war’s end the American
air force was dwarfed by that of the Germans, the British, and the
French. Air Service units were in combat just seven months; during
that time the weekly average of squadrons assigned to the front was
about nineteen. The official Air Service record carried a score of 781
enemy planes shot down for a loss of 289.31 If the scale of combat
activities was limited, the ratio of victories was remarkable for a
fledgling air force. When war was declared, the Aviation Section was
I 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.