Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A I R S E R V I C E I N W O R L D W A R I
flared up, and friction occurred with air officers who had been in
France for some time. There was as well mutual antipathy between
air and ground officers. The Air Service was loath to take advice from
men who resolutely refused to enter a plane; ground officers accused
the aviators of being temperamental, lacking in the “garden variety of
home-made discipline,” of substituting a “hodgepodge of independent
personalities for an ordered administration.” 2 5 Pershing spoke of
Foulois’ staff as comprising a “lot of good men running around in
circles.” 2 6 At any rate, they proved incapable of building an effective
organization; their failure, aggravated by production delays at home
and tardiness in French deliveries, threatened to wreck all projected
aviation schedules. It was I April 1918 before the first combat squad-
ron was assigned to the front. By the time the 1st Division got its
baptism of fire a t Cantigny on 28 May, Pershing could write in his
diary, “Our aviation doing well a t the front.” Only six squadrons had
then been sent forward; by promises of the previous spring, achieve-
ment of the 4,500-plane objective should have been in sight.27
Pershing, at the instigation of some of the air officers, instituted a
thorough reorganization which followed immediately that in the
United States. O n 29 May he appointed as Chief of Air Service Brig.
Gen. Mason M. Patrick, an engineer who had nzver been in an air-
plane. Other officers were transferred, lines of authority were made
more precise, and the whole administrative structure of the Air Serv-
ice was revamped.zs A more modest objective of 2 0 2 combat squad-
rons was substituted for the AEF Aviation Project of 386.’’ The
reorganization proved salutary, and with renewed efforts at home the
Air Service was able to accelerate the rate of deployment of combat
units. By Armistice Day forty-five squadrons had been assigned to
the front.”
But with delays at home and in the AEF’s Zone of the Interior, the
combat echelon could hardly assume the decisive role so confidently
predicted in the spring of 1917. Even a t the war’s end the American
air force was dwarfed by that of the Germans, the British, and the
French. Air Service units were in combat just seven months; during
that time the weekly average of squadrons assigned to the front was
about nineteen. The official Air Service record carried a score of 781
enemy planes shot down for a loss of 289.31 If the scale of combat
activities was limited, the ratio of victories was remarkable for a
fledgling air force. When war was declared, the Aviation Section was
I 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.