Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 386 …More threatening were Rommel’s forces in North Africa, for the very existence of the air…
  • p. 387 …the route over which the Far East Air Force had received its thirty-five heavy bombers…
  • p. 551 …Formerly commander of the Far East Air Force in the Philip- * See above, pp. 396-97…
  • p. 561 …of an air force, depended upon a line of communications extending across the Indian and At…
  • p. 570 …the American air force would be used in the Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean area…
  • p. 571 …Accordingly, on 24 May the order committing the Tenth Air Force to operations under RAF supervision…
  • p. 577 …involved in estab- lishing and operating an air force in Asia. The report of the Grady…
  • p. 630 …Policy for Disposition of US and British Air Forces.” l6 This memorandum greatly extended the scope…
  • p. 797 …MacArthur argued that now was a pro- pitious moment to rush forces from the Indian and…
  • p. 819 …5 8 - 6 7 Eighth Air Force, I, 326ff.; Achtung Indianer, a history of VIII FC…
  • p. 850 …See also CBI; Air Forces, Tenth AF. 336407 3537 356, 3803 395-96, q857 496 India…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
production, some were acquired from the Air Service Command, but
others became available as the result of a presidential order of 6 May
directing the Secretary of War to commandeer all transports of the
DC-3 type operated by the domestic air carriers in excess of zoo and to
refit them “for such transport services as will most effectively serve
the war purposes of the United nation^.''^^^ The transfer of the air-
craft from the airlines to the War Department made it possible for the
former also to release additional crews for employment in military
operations.
A long-range air supply system, conducted on the basis of pre-
determined and established schedules and operating into or through
a number of theaters and independent commands exercising military
jurisdiction along overseas air routes, had to be reasonably free from
control by local commanders. A transport or ferried airplane flying
from the West Coast to Australia in 1942 passed through the territory
of four principal commands before reaching its destination; and over
the North Atlantic a plane flying from the United States to Great Brit-
ain might traverse the jurisdictional area of as many as five separate
theater or base commands. In the early months of the war, the theater
commanders, whose powers, traditionally, were almost without limits
within the established boundaries of their own commands, frequently
diverted scheduled transport aircraft and crews operating under the
control of the Ferrying Command to their own immediate tactical
needs. In other instances, ferrying crews, upon completion of deliv-
eries to a theater, were held for a time by local authorities instead of
being returned promptly to the United States. While such practices
might have been justified in emergencies, if carried too far they would
have led inevitably to a complete breakdown of the developing system
of strategic air supply. The theater commanders were, in short, adopt-
ing a policy contrary to their own long-range
The jurisdictional difficulty began in the Middle East early in 1942
when Brig. Gen. Elmer E. Adler, then the ranking Air Corps officer
in that area, attempted to pre-empt control of Ferrying Command
operations and personnel in Africa. The misunderstanding, however,
was promptly removed by strongly worded messages from General
Arnold and General Olds.zooMore serious and prolonged interference
came from the commanding generals of the Southwest Pacific Area,
the China-Burma-India theater, and the Alaska Defense Command.’’’
The necessity for protecting Ferrying Command operations was the
364

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.