Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A I R S E R V I C E I N W O R L D W A R I
tration of the war, adverse rumors began to be noised about. Rumors
were followed by disclosures, disclosures by congressional and presi-
dential investigations. In the spring it became obvious that, in spite of
the patent falsity of charges of graft and sabotage, the program was
failing; the huge cloud of planes which was to have darkened German
skies by June was as yet hardly larger than a man’s hand. Actually the
first U.S.-built DH-4 with Liberty engine was shipped from Hoboken
on 1 5 March and was airborne in France on 1 7 May, two months
after the great German offensive had been launched.ls In the mean-
while, the widely advertised threat of American air power had
spurred German plane production; the enemy sardonically dubbed
his intensified efforts of I 9 I 7 the Amerikaprogramnm.
Disillusionment in the United States was painful, but it brought
speedy reform. With legislative authority granted by the Overman
Act of 2 0 May 1918,President Wilson by executive order removed
Army aviation from the jurisdiction of the Signal Corps. Responsi-
bilities for training and operations were vested in a Director of Mili-
tary Aeronautics (Maj. Gen. William L. Kenly). A new executive
agency, the Bureau of Aircraft Production, was “to exercise full and
exclusive jurisdiction and control over production of aeroplanes,
engines, and aircraft equipment” for the Army; the bureau was con-
nected with the Aircraft Board by interlocking membership. The
new organization was soon officially recognized as the Air Service,
U.S. Army; but, inasmuch as its two components reported separately
to the Secretary of War, there was in reality no common policy for
the makers and users of planes. This functional duality was long to
plague the Army air arm; for the time being it was mitigated by the
appointment on 27 August of the civilian head of the Bureau of Air-
craft Production, Mr. John D. Ryan, as Director of Air Service (over
both phases of aviation) and as Second Assistant Secretary of War.lg
The latter appointment was a move in the direction of separate cabinet
representation for air, a measure which had been previously suggested
in Congress and which was proving successful in England. But the
arrangement was only a wartime expedient which recognized a cleav-
age within the War Department without providing a permanent
solution for the problems involved.
Under the new regime production increased rapidly, though it is
only fair to point out that many of the most stubborn dlaculties were
already yielding on the eve of the reorganization. Statistics emanating
9

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.