Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R T R A N S P O R T A N D F E R R Y I N G
closed down since the preceding October when the Ferrying Com-
mand had been forced to discontinue its B-24 shuttle service. There-
after, three of TWA's Stratoliners operated regularly over the North
Atlantic into Britain.169
War with Japan had also focused attention on the alarmingly inade-
quate state of United States defenses in Alaska and brought about an
early speed-up in work already under way toward the establishment
of an air route to the northwest. In December 1941,the air bases and
weather and communications facilities along the inland route through
Canada, running east of the Rocky Mountains and crossing over
through Whitehorse to Fairbanks, were in a state that might be
described as usable under optimum conditions."' These conditions did
not exist in the winter of 1941-42,as was discovered in January when
an attempt to ferry twenty-five P-40's and thirteen B-26's along the
route met with disaster." On 2 0 February 1942, the U.S. government
entered into a contract with Northwest Airlines, giving that organi-
zation the main responsibility for further development of the inland
Not only was Northwest to operate an air transport service;
it was also to make whatever improvements were required to enable
the route to support the flow of ferried military traffic that was antici-
pated. The transport service provided a means for the quick return
of ferrying crews following the completion of deliveries and assured
a fast mail service as well as air cargo space for the movement of a
limited amount of urgently needed supplies, such as airplane parts and
communications equipment, and essential personnel. By terms of the
contract, terminal points were established at Fargo, North Dakota,
and Fairbanks, but the southern terminus was soon shifted to Minne-
apolis, where cargo for air shipment could more easily be assembled.
Northwest dispatched its first survey flight on 2 7 February, which
was followed during March by a series of shuttles to familiarize pilots
with the route and to deploy personnel and materials required for
regularly scheduled operation^.'^^
Quantitatively viewed, the Alaskan operation was of little conse-
quence before the last days of May. Reports of Northwest Airlines
show that in the period from 2 1 March through 3 0 April approxi-
mately 1 7 0 tons of cargo and 2 5 8 passengers were carried, and that
the corresponding figures for the month of May were 240 tons and
63 I passengers. About one-third of the April total and more than half
* See above, pp. 303-4.
3 5 7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.