Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
responsibility of the Chief Signal Officer, who did not have a con-
trolling voice in production of materiel. Both these functions, for
Army aviation, were under jurisdiction of the War Department but
without clear-cut lines of responsibility or arrangements for co-ordi-
nation. The General Staff was without experience in formulating air
policies and more interested in other matters. Hence, in effect, the
air program assumed a position of semidetachment from the rest of
the war effort with a shaky organization and with no precedent to
serve as a guide.15
With an ample purse but no precise knowledge of their aviation
requirements, American leaders had to turn to the European Allies
for advice. The counsel received was not always divorced from selfish
national and private interests, and it was rarely given with a true un-
derstanding of the situation in America. Co-ordination with the over-
all military program was faulty. On recommendation of an American
mission sent to Europe in June under newly commissioned Col.
Raynal C. Bolling, it was decided to forego for the present the develop-
ment of purely American designs and the manufacture of pursuit
planes, whose models changed too rapidly for standardization in fac-
tories so distantly removed from the front. Toward fulfilling the
objectives set for July 1918 the United States should concentrate
mainly on production of trainers, of the English-designed De Havil-
land 4, a two-place reconnaissance-bomber, and of the newly devel-
oped Liberty engine. Other types, including pursuits in great numbers,
were to be purchased abroad.16 An extensive training program was
inaugurated, entailing the use of American universities for ground-
school work and newly built fields for primary flight instruction.
Advanced training was for the most part scheduled for overseas
schools, where combat experience of the Allies could be more readily
exploited. Instruction of mechanics was similarly divided between
American and European
The program got off to a late start and suffered a number of unan-
ticipated interruptions. Amid the general confusion which character-
ized the early war effort, aviation was especially handicapped by slow
communications between the combat line and the factory, by lack
of centralized control, and by difficulties inherent in attempting to
build an aircraft industry overnight. Public hopes, fanned by reports
more enthusiastic than accurate, continued high throughout 19 I 7.
Early in the new year, amid the widespread criticism of the adminis-
8

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.