Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A I R S E R V I C E I N W O R L D W A R I
the attitudes and convictions of the Army’s airmen on the eve of their
second war.
From Aviation Section to Air Service
The story of the Army air arm in World War I was one of promise
rather than of achievement. The combat record was excellent, but brief
and on a scale far more modest than the public had been led to expect.
This explains why most of the official reports of the Air Service’s war
activities were compounded of statistics and apology, There is now
little cause to wonder at the failure to make good the brave promises
of 1917-indeed, but for their extravagance, the feebleness of the air
effort might have received far less public criticism. But, in order to
secure support for unprecedented appropriations, those in charge of
military aviation, civilians and officers alike, made rash predictions.
Probably their claims were inspired by inexperience rather than by
an outright lack of candor, but they were wholly unwarranted; and,
when the failure of the program became a matter of common h o w l -
edge, reaction was bitter. Reorganization was swift and effective, and,
had the war dragged on into 1919,the boasts might have been made
good, if somewhat tardily.
On 1 3 June 1917 a spokesman for the newly created Aircraft Pro-
duction Board said for publication: “We believe we have worked
out a program which will make it possible for the United States to
secure to the Allies next year the permanent supremacy of the air, and
with that we hope to become an immediate, decisive factor in ending
the war.” The program to which he referred was, by existing stand-
ards, huge. It had been suggested to the United States government by
French Premier Ribot in a cable received 26 May. Ribot had asked
that the Americans place a t the French front by 3 0 June 1918a “flying
corps” of 4,500 planes, 5,000 pilots, and 50,000 mechanics. As elabo-
rated by officers of the Aviation Section, this program provided for a
total of 22,625 aircraft, including 1 2 , 0 0 0 of the latest service models,
and a training establishment equipped to graduate from primary
schools 6,2 10pilots.z Ribot had requested for the next spring campaign
an air force larger by far than that which the French had been able to
build in three years of war and wholly out of proportion, according to
existing ratios of air to ground forces, to infantry troops then contem-
plated for the AEF. Perhaps the formidable demand was more than
a tribute to American industrial capacity. It came close on the heels of
5

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.