Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
A I R T R A N S P O R T A N D F E R R Y I N G
Air Force in the Middle East and the Tenth Air Force in India. Fighter
aircraft for the Ninth and Tenth Air Forces and for the American
Volunteer Group in China were shipped by water to the west coast
of Africa and were then ferried overland to their destinations. And,
while ferrying operations were increasing steadily, an air transport
service in support of both ferrying and combat operations was en-
larged and extended.
The ferrying service and the air transport service developed by the
AAF in World War I1 operated over the same routes, used the same
bases, and were interdependent to such a degree that control was
lodged in a single military agency. Known originally as the Air Corps
Ferrying Command, it became the Air Transport Command in June
'942.
The Air Corps Ferrying Command
The Air Corps Ferrying Command had its origins in 1941 in an
attempt to assist the British in the delivery of American-built aircraft
to England. The British had pointed the way toward development of
long-range strategic air supply services by establishing early in the
war air supply lines from North America to the United Kingdom
and from the home base to the Middle East.* In November 1940 a
Canadian civilian agency under contract with the British government
began .the ferrying of American-built bombers across the North Atlan-
tic from Newfoundland to Scotland, a distance of approximately
2,100 miles. This was the first step in the spanning of the Atlantic with
an aerial supply bridge, comparable as a development in military
supply to the first use of the railroad as a logistical instrument in the
wars of the nineteenth century. The hazardous route across the North
Atlantic constituted, however, only one segment of a long supply line
that reached from the factories of southern California to the airfields
of Britain. The bombers, purchased for cash from American manu-
facturers prior to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act, were first fer-
ried by factory-employed pilots from California to Montreal. There
they were turned over to the civilian pilots of the British Atlantic
Before the war, Germany and the U.S.S.R. had led in experimenting with the
use of military air transport in the deployment of airborne troops; and during the
early period of the war, particularly in the invasion of Norway and later of Crete,
Germany proved the tactical effectiveness of the transport airplane. But neither of
these countries had envisaged, nor were they under a real necessity to ,develop under
war conditions, the type of long-range strategic air supply services whlch the United
States and Great Britain were to employ so effectively.
3 ' 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.