Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
work of resiting Alaskan radar installations was further complicated
by an involved command situation which made it necessary to refer
recommendations of the fighter command of the Eleventh Air Force
through regular channels to the Western Defense Command. Worse
still, there was a procedure in effect which required that proposed
changes in radar sites be processed through the War Department
before corrective action could be instituted.la1 Indeed, there was not
even an agreement in early 1942 as to how extensive a warning net
was required for Alaska. General DeWitt of the Western Defense
Command presented in January a strong plea for a “cordon” defense
based on a screen of twenty radar sets so arranged as to guard all vital
military installations.ls2 Officers in Washington found that commit-
ments to other theaters made it impossible to provide all of the equip-
ment that would be required and reduced the number of stations to
ten.’83By June 1942,however, not even this minimum figure had been
provided, for only two radar sets were in operation in Alaska, with
two more en route.ls4 As a result, the Eleventh Air Force had to
depend on bomber patrols for intelligence of enemy movements. The
assignment in March 1942 of four heavy bombers equipped with ASV
radars made the use of such aerial patrols more efficient,la5but the
lack of an aircraft warning service was keenly felt.
Only in the Aleutians and along the water routes of the western
Atlantic and the Caribbean did our enemies make any serious effort to
test the defenses of the Western Hemisphere, and it was fortunate
that this proved true. The war found us, as this chapter has shown,
by no means ready for large-scale enemy attack. T o remedy the many
deficiencies revealed a t the outset, it was necessary to immobilize on
purely defensive assignments substantial forces for which there was
urgent need overseas, to divert from offensive preparations time,
energy, and productive capacity, and to improvise and in other ways
to rely upon uneconomical methods. Yet, when the test came, it was
met, though hardly by a comfortable margin, and events proved that
the gauge of the enemy’s intentions and capabilities had been well
enough taken. Our strategy in defense of hemisphere security from the
first had been to intercept the enemy a t the greatest possible distance
from our own shores and to carry the battle to him. Though the unex-
pected exposure of our western coast by the defeat a t Pearl Harbor
gave us some uneasy moments, there was no popular hysteria to shake
the commitment to predetermined strategy. Preparations for taking
308

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.