Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 330 …Boeing in Seattle, Douglas and Lockheed in Los Angeles, and Consolidated in San Diego. In heavy…
  • p. 333 …Radars picked up an unidentified target 1 2 0 miles west of Los Angeles. Antiaircraft batteries…
  • p. 334 …belief that there were no planes over Los Angeles. But the Army did not publish these…
  • p. 335 …The Los Angeles Times,in a first-page editorial on 2 6 February, announced that “the…
  • p. 336 …I 1 to have been released over Los Angeles 93-may well have caused the initial…
  • p. 772 …Los Angeles Times, 2 7 Feb. 1942. 87. Ibid. 88. Ibid. 89. Quoted in Los Angeles…
  • p. 773 …Editorial, N e w York Times, 28 Feb. 1942. 91. Los Angeles Times, I Nov. 1945…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
reduced, however, by the necessity of using the planes as a supple-
ment to radar in the identification of and indeed no matter
how many planes were supplied, the defense of the canal would remain
imperfect until better means for detection of an approaching enemy
had been provided. This problem was not solved until 1943.
Reinforcements and New Bases for Alaska
Fortunately, when the enemy struck, the blow fell on the Aleutians
and not in Panama. T h e defenses of the Alaskan area were no better
prepared, but the stake was smaller. In December 1941, fundamental
questions regarding air defense plans in the North Pacific had hardly
been solved; it was not until 26 November that the decision had finally
been made to build an airfield on Umnak Island for the protection of
Dutch Harbor.” Substantial progress had been made under earlier
and more limited plans of defense; but only a handful of combat planes
were based on Elmendorf Field a t Anchorage, and preparations for
moving up air reinforcements from the States in the event of an
emergency were still imperfect.17’
After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that emergency seemed
unmistakably imminent. T h e Chief of Staff informed the President in
January 1942 that the W a r Department feared a damaging raid on
Alaska “at any moment,” and prophesied that as soon as the Japanese
could assemble troops and ships they would launch an effort toward
actual occupation” of a base in that area.171This prospect had led to
a prompt decision to send aerial reinforcements to the threatened out-
post, even in the face of the well-understood risks of winter flights
along imperfectly developed airways.’ 7 2 Because Alaska was part of
the Western Theater of Operations, responsibility for the movement
was assigned to the Western Defense Command. T h e shortage of
trained aircrews made it necessary to assign to this project squadrons
composed of men untrained in Alaskan flight conditions. A pursuit
squadron of twenty-five P-40’s was secured by assignment of the I I th
Pursuit Squadron from Meridian, Mississippi, and thirteen B-2 6 me-
dium bombers were ordered to be flown to Alaska by the 77th Bom-
bardment Squadron from Boise, Idaho.
Notification of the movement was given on 10 December 1941,but
two weeks elapsed before the planes reached the Sacramento Air
Depot to be winterized. Hastily conceived and inadequately organ-
d i
* See above, pp. 167-68.
3 0 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.