Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
reduced, however, by the necessity of using the planes as a supple-
ment to radar in the identification of and indeed no matter
how many planes were supplied, the defense of the canal would remain
imperfect until better means for detection of an approaching enemy
had been provided. This problem was not solved until 1943.
Reinforcements and New Bases for Alaska
Fortunately, when the enemy struck, the blow fell on the Aleutians
and not in Panama. T h e defenses of the Alaskan area were no better
prepared, but the stake was smaller. In December 1941, fundamental
questions regarding air defense plans in the North Pacific had hardly
been solved; it was not until 26 November that the decision had finally
been made to build an airfield on Umnak Island for the protection of
Dutch Harbor.” Substantial progress had been made under earlier
and more limited plans of defense; but only a handful of combat planes
were based on Elmendorf Field a t Anchorage, and preparations for
moving up air reinforcements from the States in the event of an
emergency were still imperfect.17’
After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that emergency seemed
unmistakably imminent. T h e Chief of Staff informed the President in
January 1942 that the W a r Department feared a damaging raid on
Alaska “at any moment,” and prophesied that as soon as the Japanese
could assemble troops and ships they would launch an effort toward
actual occupation” of a base in that area.171This prospect had led to
a prompt decision to send aerial reinforcements to the threatened out-
post, even in the face of the well-understood risks of winter flights
along imperfectly developed airways.’ 7 2 Because Alaska was part of
the Western Theater of Operations, responsibility for the movement
was assigned to the Western Defense Command. T h e shortage of
trained aircrews made it necessary to assign to this project squadrons
composed of men untrained in Alaskan flight conditions. A pursuit
squadron of twenty-five P-40’s was secured by assignment of the I I th
Pursuit Squadron from Meridian, Mississippi, and thirteen B-2 6 me-
dium bombers were ordered to be flown to Alaska by the 77th Bom-
bardment Squadron from Boise, Idaho.
Notification of the movement was given on 10 December 1941,but
two weeks elapsed before the planes reached the Sacramento Air
Depot to be winterized. Hastily conceived and inadequately organ-
d i
* See above, pp. 167-68.
3 0 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.