Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
reached in December, but the runway would not be ready until May
1942.’’~Upon his return to the United States, Secretary Stimson
initiated action to secure a base in southern Mexi~o,’’~but the negoti-
ations were held up by the problem of control of the field that was to
be built.“’ Although ASV radars were on their way to Panama, pilots
a t the time were still depending on visual observation, and the planes
were so few in number that even had they all been radar-equipped
they would have been unequal to the task assigned. The burden of
maintaining the daily patrol was so heavy that no planes could be kept
ifi reserve for a striking force, with the result that even if an enemy
carrier had been detected there would have been no way of offering
immediate resistance. By mid- I 942 the bomber forces available had
been improved by the gradual substitution of more modern planes,
and, with substantial progress by the AAF in the installation of ASV
equipment, the problem of airborne radar as an aid to patrol was no
longer ~ r i t i c a 1 . l ~ ~
The problems involved in providing a serviceable radar screen to
alert the inner defenses of the canal were less easily solved. In March
1942,there were only eight early warning radar stations in operation
in Panama, with six more under construction.les Equipment in use at
these stations was inadequate for early warning and “quite useless” for
purposes of controlled interception. Sites had been selected for four
British-type radars, the sets to be supplied from Canadian production,
but improvement in equipment could not overcome deficiencies of
operating personnel. Operators in Panama were largely untrained, had
been given no indoctrination in the need for precision standards, and
were frequently unenthusiastic about their assignmeht. Radar crews
had made no effort to plot the permanent echoes in their search areas,
and therefore could not discriminate between such echoes and “live”
targets. The combination of inadequate equipment, poor site selection,
and untrained operators produced such inefficiency that even the best
station in Panama was “far below any acceptable standard of oper-
ational utility.” The elimination of all the deficiencies noted depended
on action by the War Department to provide improved equipment
and better trained crews. No complete remedy was available to local
commanders.
Conditions among the fighter units themselves had been improved
with the addition of more modern equipment, new satellite fields, and
facilities for dispersing and concealing aircraft. Effective strength was
302

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.