Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
the First Air Force took over responsibility for defense operations
along the entire extent of the Atlantic coast. This arrangement lasted
until the fall of 1943, when the danger of air attack had greatly de-
creased and the First and Fourth Air Forces were reassigned to the
AAF.14‘ Much earlier-in March I 942-the Eastern Defense Command
had ceased to be a theater of operation^.^^'
Although the actual direction of air defense operations was thus
assigned to the theater commands, the AAF retained vital responsibili-
ties for training and experimental development. In the reorganization
of the W a r Department in March 1942, the reconstituted AAF staff
included a director of Air Defense.143T o this post was assigned Col.
Gordon P. Saville, whose energy and vision had been in large part
responsible for the rapid progress made in 1941 toward the creation
of an aircraft warning service. His experience in the experimental
work of the Air Defense Command and firsthand observation of the
operation of British defenses had convinced him that progress in the
development of an American defense depended on indoctrination of
key personnel in the latest techniques of controlled interception.
Accordingly, he secured the establishment (March 1942) of the Air
Defense Operational Training Unit, later renamed the Fighter Com-
mand School. This unit set up in Florida an ideal air defense net based
on the British system, using VHF radio and modern radar equip-
ment.144T h e R A F sent skilled officers and technicians to act in an
advisory capacity, but care was taken to adjust tactical procedures to
American usages. In addition to indoctrinating command and staff
members in the latest defense methods, the school trained radar units
and tested equipment. Its responsibilities included study of the tactical
and materiel requirements of overseas commands as well as the de-
mands of continental defense. At the expense of existing task forces,
the few specialists available were held for training of the large number
of technicians that would be required for later
T h e organizational adjustments directed on 30 December I 941 had
been accomplished by the end of February 1942, and thereafter the
pattern of continental air defenses became increasingly clear. Along
the Pacific coast from Canada to Mexico a “vital air defense zone” of
approximately I 50 miles depth and extending 2 0 0 miles seaward was
created by the Western Defense Command, and a similar zone along
the Atlantic coast was established by the Eastern Defense Command.146
Air operations within the western zone were directed by the Fourth
2 9 5

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.