Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
sharper definition of individual targets was possible. His enthusiasm,
and the sustained research efforts of a large number of scientists at the
Radiation Laboratory, led to the production within six months of a
practical working model. By 1944, perfected MEW radar was ready
to assist in the invasion of Europe, and the offensive employment of
this new instrument revolutionized conceptions of what radar could
A weapon inspired by the problem of defending the West Coast
thus proved to be a valuable contribution to victory in other theaters.
Helpful, also, to an immediate improvement of continental air
defenses were organizational changes which served to clarify respon-
sibilities. The Western Defense Command had been designated a
theater of operations on 1 1 December 1941,with General DeWitt
in command. With its headquarters a t San Francisco, the command
included an extensive area of nine western states, Alaska, and the
Aleutians, and to it three air forces were initially assigned-the Fourth
and Second Air Forces along the Pacific coast and, in addition, the
Alaskan Air Force. A similar situation existed on the other side of the
continent, where on 2 0 December the Eastern Theater of Operations
was established with headquarters in New York City and with Lt.
Gen. Hugh Drum in command of defense units in the eastern seaboard
states and in Newfoundland and Bermuda. T w o air forces, the First
and the Third, were assigned to this theater.13’ Thus all four of the
domestic air forces, which had been created early in 1941 and had
been operating under the Air Force Combat Command, were removed
from AAF control and placed under theater commanders. It is not sur-
prising that this arrangement pleased no one: the defense commands
found it confusing to have more than one subordinate air force com-
mander, while the AAF felt that its combat training program would
be jeopardized if it had no direct control of any of the continental air
forces. A compromise was aecordingly worked out and announced on
3 0 December 1 9 4 1 . ~ ~ ’The essential element of the new plan was a
provision which called for moving two of the continental air forces
to inland stations and assigning them to the AAF as “training Air
Forces.” T o effect this arrangement, the Second Air Force relin-
quished its coastal stations in Washington and Oregon and was re-
moved from assignment to the Western Defense Command; air defense
duties for the entire Pacific coast were thereupon assigned to the
Fourth Air Force. A similar move within the Eastern Defense Com-
mand made the Third Air Force a training unit under the AAF, while
294

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.